It all started with the unofficial godot discord admin dealing with some chuds and people turning their ire towards the Godot Foundation staff instead.

Since Godot has stubbornly remained on the Xitter nazi bar as a valid space for PR and social media interaction and dared to promote the Wokot hashtag and reiterate their progessiveness, the reactionaries infesting that space are now piling on their socials and harassing everyone they can get their eyes on.

Examples

Anyway, solidarity with the targets of harassment. I hope they finally realize that Xitter is a lost cause.

Update: Godot is being review-bombed

Fortunately the reactionary backlash seems to be having the opposite effect

  • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Tbh I’m not sure what your examples are supposed to demonstrate. Blocking someone for saying they should focus on the engine and not politics is astonishingly thin skinned

    Kind of hard to follow the thread of most of this but they sure aren’t disproving how woke they are by blocking people who even slightly disagree with them.

    Also it’s just “X” not “Xitter”.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      astonishingly thin skin

      Could be that, but remember that all skin can be damaged. If you’ve been badly burned then maybe it’s best to keep the environment sterile. “Focus on the engine and not politics” can be the conclusion of people with merely a simple goal of a good game engine but suppose that it can also be argued for with a goal of harming minorities by silencing them.

      • Raptor :gamedev:@mastodon.gamedev.place
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        @tabular @FizzyOrange would hardly even call blocking people for saying, mind you in a thread literally only asking people to post their inclusive games, that they are going to post the most offensive, racist things they can find (their words, not mine)…“thin skinned”

        the nazi bar sure can twist a narrative though :/

    • b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s “Xitter”. “X” is nonsense.

      You can’t just start calling yourself “X” and decide the word cisgender is a slur now and not expect people to laugh in your face.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s not Xitter. I don’t understand why you think it is. I don’t know what your cisgender comment is talking about.

        • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          English doesn’t really have a well defined way to write down the “zjush” from the “su” in pleasure.

          The most accepted ways are “zh” or “x” in English, or ʒ in IPA.

          Since most people call it twitter, and Elon want to call it x, so people push them together to make xitter, because it sounds like “shitter” (the crude term for toilet) and because the quality of twitter has declined dramatically to the point that it resembles an unclean toilet.

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Xitter is simply short for “Elon Musk’s X, formerly known as Twitter, currently known as dumpster fire”

    • drspod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      they sure aren’t disproving how woke they are

      Why do you think that they need to be doing this?

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Because being woke is generally considered to be a bad thing? (Even if people disagree about what counts as woke.)

        If you want to take your emotions out of it, remember “political correctness gone mad”? That’s basically the 90s “woke” and nobody would aspire to it.

        • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Because being woke is generally considered to be a bad thing?

          No. Being woke is only considered bad in toxic echo chambers where they’ve tried to poison the word.

          Most people who self report as “anti-woke” repeat infectious and carefully crafted but fallacious talking points whenever the term “woke” is said.

          But if you bring up a situation where a minority is getting the bad end of the stick and they agree with you that it’s bad, they don’t realise that they themselves are being woke. They agree with being woke so long as the label “woke” isn’t used. It’s when you point that out that they start to realise that they’ve been poisoned against the term.

          Being woke simply means that some people don’t often get the same affordances as others.

          If you accept the general fact that women tend to get paid less for the same amount of work, then you’re woke.

          If you accept the general fact that black people might not get hired if a person doing the hiring is racist, then you’re woke.

          If you accept the general fact that some people have to hide the fact that they’re not heterosexual in some countries otherwise they’ll suffer the death penalty, then you’re woke.

        • Gamma@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Ah, so you don’t actually know what you’re talking about! The term “woke” has turned into a toxic catchall used by the generally hateful to describe anything they don’t agree with socially (aka heteronormative white male). It’s pretty obvious when you look at most the people using the term negatively.

          There’s no shame in not knowing something and you’ve got a bit of learning to catch up on, good luck!

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This has nothing to do with Musk. Honestly these kinds of dismissive comments just make everyone else seem more reasonable.