• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get that you do not have to upvote something you disagree with, but we shouldn’t downvote this guy for an honest, different opinion. That’s how you create a hive mind.

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree with that and I upvoted you, I don’t understand the downvote mentality, either you upvote or you don’t do anything, downvote should simply not exists.

      • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wholeheartedly disagree. Downvotes are my favorite part of this kind of comment system. I know that, per the rules, “downvotes aren’t for disagreement”, but most people don’t respect that and I think it’s asinine. Both kinds of votes are a valuable way of contributing to a discussion without having to spend the time and effort to write a comment.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Except for the fact that downvotes hide those comments. So all you are doing is creating an echo chamber where everyone agrees or gets removed from discourse.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wasn’t me. But downvotes are great when used appropriately. We want shit that isn’t worth reading to get filtered to the bottom. A joke that isn’t worth reading. Off topic shit that isn’t a relevant tangent. Spam. Uncalled for rudeness.

        But that shouldn’t mean every opinion that disagrees with your own.

        Maybe downvotes should be limited. I don’t know that there’s a good technical way to fix this issue.