• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Also we should stop acting so prudent about sex in regards to teenagers.

    If the attendees are not expecting to be involved in a sexual activity and a teenager is old enough to experience sexuality, acts mature, otherwise walk around without supervision and makes their own choices to visit such panel. What harm is their really?

    With actual kids there is no doubt, they stick out where they don’t belong.

    I would draw the line, i would look at wether or not there is doubt, and give benefit of the doubt to whoever acts mature.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the panel members are uncomfortable, it’s their choice.

      They aren’t consenting to conducting adult discussion with kids around.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If you want to put it that way:

        I made a very hard line when the public may become part of the act. But at that point everyone should be ID’d and over the legal age.

        I am sort of saying lower the age to give consent to watch/observe public events that include sex elements, like a panel for an adult show. (Its not like teens don’t know how to use the internet, they probable have watched hazbin hotel if they are at the panel)

        Actual kids, who should not be unsupervised on the internet are completely out the scope. You cannot give consent for something you don’t fully understand.

        If you want to talk age of consent to fuck i am more in favor of a sliding window of acceptable within their age group. Not because they should have sex but because we should respect that teens do experience sexuality and the desire to experiment with that.