• niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    No Oppenheimer?!!
    Your geek credentials are hereby revoked until further notice!
    Or until you atone!

    • portuga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Subject matter doesn’t appeal to me much, and I’m also not very fond of the lead actor (no particular reason, he’s a great actor) If it serves as consolation I only watched like 15min of barbie, either

      • Ziglin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I didn’t make it through 5min of Barbie lol

        Oppenheimer was good and had nice music too.

      • niktemadur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s a movie about physics, with characters like Niels Bohr featured prominently, which just so happened to be made for general audiences and it was a hit, by a director whose other historical film was about Dunkirk.

        Before these movies were made, the subjects were pretty much obscure to the mainstream. Films like these are regarded as risky for large studios, and it’s widely acknowledged that Christopher Nolan is on the very short list of directors with the blessing to do absolutely whatever they want at large studio scale and budget and that is not part of a franchise. And by “very short list” I mean people like Stanley Kubrick.

        The “mainstream” label on Oppenheimer is incidental, after the fact.

        • portuga@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I would watch an edit of the movie that only featured the physics part of it. It’s the boring part I don’t have time for