Let’s gooooooooo

  • eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a bad idea! The attack vector issue they mention in the PR comments is valid, though. Not displaying those errors gives an attacker no confirmation that a user whose account they’re trying to attack exists, if they’re trying known used passwords. But good on you doing what you can to contribute to the project!

    • Venator@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      There should be an error, but it shouldn’t say whether it was the email or password that was wrong.

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        An attacker would still know the account exists, and they would know the password did not match.

        Or you’re assuring them that specific password is used by some account, just not this one. Which is even worse.

      • eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Theoretically yeah. Depends on how quickly the attacker is working or if they have enough information to know where the account lives. If they’re doing their due diligence, they could 100% confirm that. But if they aren’t, they might just go to a random instance, try logging in, and see if it works.

        By no means is it bad to offer a response, but it always risks giving an attacker more information than they need/the victim would want to have discovered about them.