• GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    GoG is just as well. Epic, Ubishit, EA.

    Take a look at all of them and take the best choice for yourself. No monopoly, here. Steam isn’t paying EA and Ubisoft to suck. They’d suck if Valve existed or not.

    Steam isn’t the only choice for a gamer any more than a cheap Civic is the only choice for a poor college freshman.

    He could do a lot worse.

    • imecth@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, we definitely do have a steam monopoly on desktop, they might not be abusing their position much, as of yet anyways, but it’s a monopoly all the same. They captured the desktop playerbase in their little ecosystem and now people are stuck because of their game catalog, achievements, friend list…

      What we really need is a standardization of these systems and interoperability between platforms so that they’re forced to actually compete instead of being miles ahead just by virtue of being there first.

      • Teils13
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        For managing a library of videogames on the desktop, including integration with all available stores and local installs, there is Playnite for Windows and Lutris for Linux.

        • imecth@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Battle net only became a thing in like 2010, steam came very early in 2002, and started off straight away with exclusives that required you to install their client. They still do btw, there’s no portal, dota… on epic or whatever.