• IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 天前

    The investigation will also examine whether there is any evidence of misconduct or criminal acts in connection with the incident

    What is the legal definition of misconduct anyway?

    Given that Rush seemed to willfully ignore warnings from experts and fired people unwilling to do things like sign off on the safety of the sub I think there’s definitely a case for misconduct, at the very least.

    • Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 天前

      There was a really good article on this and unfortunately I can’t find it now to share

      But the gist was that Titan exploited a bunch of loopholes, among other things. The paying customers on the sub were in fact ‘marine researchers’ who coincidently made a donation, and things like that

      Some of the people who were at one point involved but left due to safety concerns raised the issue with OSHA (? - or whoever the more specific body was) who repeatedly failed to investigate or take any action

      So for me, whether or not they are able to charge the company, the industry regulators and government bodies overseeing them need to face some questions and judgements too (though it would take a more knowledgeable person than me to know what exactly that looks like)

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 天前

      I presume the investigation is taking official testimonies and gathering actual (and traceable) evidence in order to legally confirm what we all know.