Brasil
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Tech@programming.dev · 8 months ago

Google insists it's easy to add Rust code to your firmware • The Register

www.theregister.com

external-link
message-square
6
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • programming@programming.dev
31
external-link

Google insists it's easy to add Rust code to your firmware • The Register

www.theregister.com

sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Tech@programming.dev · 8 months ago
message-square
6
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • programming@programming.dev
Google insists it's easy to add Rust code to your firmware
www.theregister.com
external-link
Not so much when trying to convert coding veterans
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Given last week’s stories about Rust and the Linux kernel, this almost feels like a pointed message from Google’s devs to the Linux kernel devs.

  • kersplomp@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nit: One engineer at a company saying something is not the same as that whole company saying something. I wish they would just say “Google employee insists…”

  • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Make sense. Firmware is also extra difficult to debug so it’s nice to use a language that significantly reduces the amount of debugging you need to do.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe but at this point any thing google suggests is a signpost to do the opposite

  • refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I want to see specific examples of serious bugs that rust would catch that clang -Weverything, clazy/clang-tidy and scan-build would not find for C++… because I’m still not convinced it is anywhere near worth learning at all for career/veteran C and C++ folks.

    • DeprecatedCompatV2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      This isn’t a complete answer to the question you asked, but it could be: https://security.googleblog.com/2022/12/memory-safe-languages-in-android-13.html

Tech@programming.dev

tech@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !tech@programming.dev

A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes

Things that fit:

  • New tech releases
  • Major tech changes
  • Major milestones for tech
  • Major tech news such as data breaches, discontinuation

Things that don’t fit

  • Minor app updates
  • Government legislation
  • Company news
  • Opinion pieces

Community Wiki

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 5 users / day
  • 153 users / week
  • 363 users / month
  • 680 users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 1.04K subscribers
  • 93 Posts
  • 355 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Vacant@programming.dev
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org