• bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the “I disagree but can’t articulate a cogent reason for it” sense of the word “nonsense”, of course. 🙄

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Might be worth reading up on history to put some facts behind those feelings. Either you’ll find out you’re right or you’ll update your beliefs to be more correct.

    • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Democratically instituted communisim? For all the uppity yall get when someone suggests democratic socialist policies, you sure can’t seem to find the line you blurred.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        My country was on the path of the democratically instituted socialism thing. Well, it tried but the United States instigated, funded and armed a military coup and the military dictatorship that followed.

        Guess it’s better to have torture camps than gobbunism

        • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          Democratic Socialism is alive and well in many countries without any U.S. intervention. You must be referring to the fascist kind.

          • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Ah, yes, the United States famously only interferes in fascist countries and not for benefit of plutocrats.

            Also, which demsoc countries are you talking about where the means of production are controlled by the working class?

            • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              What kind of argument is that? You’ve literally reiterated the spirit of this meme and directed it towards the U.S. The question was name a country that has instituted communisim successfully. As for part 2, you live in a fantasy that worker controlled production can exist without any administration or bureaucracy, ie. centralization. This right here is what true socialism has failed at repeatedly. Name one successful example.

                • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Oh, here come the uppity remarks, I am a dual citizen of a country with a socialist party, thanks for the down-the-nose leer in my direction without providing any education.

                  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Is that socialist party in power? Is it actually socialist, or does it just call itself that? Because a lot of European “socialist” parties aren’t; most are liberal social welfare parties at best.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                So every AES state is also Democratic Socialist too.

                Or do you mean Socialism established through liberal reform? That’s very rare, only really established in countries like Chile under Allende, before the US supported a coup to overthrow him.

                • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That’s underselling it. Before he was even president, the CIA kidnapped and killed the Commander in Chief of the Chilean army for refusing to send the army during his inauguration. There was political and economical warfare for fear of a “functioning socialist government” in South America. According to Nixon “the choice of government by the Chileans was unacceptable”.