• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It makes sense.

    Not only is it easier to look in someone balls than someone’s brain, the fact that it can cross the blood brain barrier is pretty fucking crazy.

    It’s not like someone said “we gotta find out if this can get inside testicles stat!” It’s that between cancer and fertility issues balls are looked at pretty frequently, and we found micro plastics there.

    The reason we found it in the brain. Is someone asked if it was possible and that’s a big enough deal to go out and look.

  • BakerBagel@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s much easier to get tissue from testicles than a brain sample. About 10,000 men develop testicular cancer annually in the US. Plenty of test can still be ran on those testicles if the patient consents. Getting a aample of brain tissue usually requires the donor to be dead, and there is a long list of scientists that would loke to stidy brain matter for one reason or another.

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not to mention that gender affirming surgery increases the likelihood that doctors will have access to testicles for research.

      I mean, not by a lot but it’s a hell of a lot easier to survive donating your testicles to science than it is your brain.

      • Shou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The amount of people who donated theor body to science is overwhelming. So much, that lots of bodies can’t be used. Some niche ectomy doesn’t increase the samples here.

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    To be fair, I’d bet that there are more men willing to ejaculate for science than people willing to have their brain analyzed for science.

  • Blackout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    So we’re going to start banning plastic right? Will the last human left please turn off the lights.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      fucking helllll, i pretend a lot that i don’t care about the downfall of the human race because i’m trying to fake it till i make it into not caring

      but between global warming, microplastics, rise in extremism, late stage capitalism, wars and genocides…

      i’m really starting to believe we might be one of the last generations of modern humans left.

  • wafflez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Do microplastics actually look like those in the picture? I always thought they were so small we couldnt see them

  • Aurelius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why do we find microplastics in humans but not other common substances (e.g. steel, wool, etc.)? I’m not too familiar with why this is happening

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Any foreign objects made up of substance that are non-reactive can end up embedded in our bodies. Most obviously, there are medical devices that might permanently be left there: screws, prosthetics, artificial meshes and valves and membranes, etc. There are also some foreign objects that come from trauma, like shrapnel. Even tattoos are foreign pigments placed in a particular layer of skin that the body doesn’t have a mechanism for clearing out.

      But generally speaking, if our body doesn’t have the enzymes to break down a substance into constituent compounds small enough to transport out, or if that foreign substance sits in a place where our body doesn’t have a mechanism to actually get to, it stays in the body.

      The reason why we’re talking about microplastics, though, is that these compounds might actually be more reactive than previously assumed. If the plastics don’t break down at all, then there’s no chemical reaction byproducts to worry about. But if they break down very slowly, and the products of those reactions interfere with our biological processes in those tiny quantities, then we have a problem.

    • PixeIOrange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because Steel and Wool degrade into their chemical components by chemical reactions (like oxidation or mold). Plastic wont, it gets smaller and smaller but it stays plastic. So Steel and Wool “skip” being really small, they become other chemicals nature can work with.

      (this might be wrong, pls correct if so)

    • NickwithaC@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Specifically steel and wool are manufactured to be what they are. The process probably involves a step to remove micro plastics.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    So those chunks of plastic were in a brain, eh? See that’s what happens when you grind LEGO in a blender and then snort rails of it.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Real talk: the balls are kinda important because it’s where the sperm is produced. If that is polluted, it may lead to birth defects or infertility.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even now, regular meghan is still thinking about plastic and balls. Nonstop. I’d think that’d be exhausting.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “I can’t stop thinking about…” is such a tired trope in posts. I never have believed it a single time.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      “…I never have believed it a single time” is such a tired tripe in comments. I can’t stop thinking about it.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    When your victim complex is so strong that you have to invent new microaggressions to continue feeling persecuted instead of thinking logically for 5 seconds.