I’m not gonna reply to everyone in this thread. But realistically, I have two choices. One of those choices is objectively worse. Can anyone actually explain to me why doing anything, including not voting, to make the worse outcome happen is actually a good thing?
Trump’s foreign policy is less hawkish than Kamala’s, somehow. I genuinely don’t see how she’s an improvement if she’ll start a war in Iran, which she seems frothing at the mouth to do given her comments about having the world’s most lethal military and criticizing Trump for not taking a harder stance on them.
I’m gonna say what I always say to peoples like you.
This logic only works if you assume that the Democrats are less bad than the Republicans. Do you have any evidence to suggest that they are? Because not a single one of you has ever given any, ever.
I’m not gonna reply to everyone in this thread. But realistically, I have two choices. One of those choices is objectively worse. Can anyone actually explain to me why doing anything, including not voting, to make the worse outcome happen is actually a good thing?
Trump’s foreign policy is less hawkish than Kamala’s, somehow. I genuinely don’t see how she’s an improvement if she’ll start a war in Iran, which she seems frothing at the mouth to do given her comments about having the world’s most lethal military and criticizing Trump for not taking a harder stance on them.
Just because Harris is worse doesn’t mean you have to vote for Trump. There is no law against not voting… yet
I’m gonna say what I always say to peoples like you.
This logic only works if you assume that the Democrats are less bad than the Republicans. Do you have any evidence to suggest that they are? Because not a single one of you has ever given any, ever.