UsedChicken@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 年前Ruleionairei.imgur.comexternal-linkmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1811arrow-down10
arrow-up1811arrow-down1external-linkRuleionairei.imgur.comUsedChicken@lemm.ee to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 年前message-square79fedilink
minus-squareWabiSabiPapi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 年前imagine a society not dependent on individual charity (with wealth expropriated from the working class) for improving material wellbeing. does a ‘nice’ king justify monarchy?
minus-squareThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 年前Does it justify it? Not at all. Does it make it slightly less bad? Yes.
minus-squarezbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前 slightly less bad What is even the point of making that point though? Do we give him a cookie for being a “nice” exploiter?
imagine a society not dependent on individual charity (with wealth expropriated from the working class) for improving material wellbeing.
does a ‘nice’ king justify monarchy?
Does it justify it? Not at all.
Does it make it slightly less bad? Yes.
What is even the point of making that point though? Do we give him a cookie for being a “nice” exploiter?