I’m just curious what you folks think. The whole idea of the Fediverse seems to go against everything Meta has stops for with their existing platforms (Facebook and Instagram).

What are they after? Are they going to try and infiltrate it so they can get people’s data and content? Are they trying to monetize it? It just doesn’t add up. I feel like most people on the Fediverse already would agree that we don’t want Meta’s platforms to access our content.

Please excuse my ignorance if it doesn’t work like I think it does. I’m relatively new to the Fediverse myself.

  • Graphine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The bright side is that given the open nature of decentralized networks, nobody is forced to use whatever Meta shits out.

    • kiddblur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not disagreeing per se, but for sites like Twitter and its clones, you go where the people you care about are. I have a mastodon account but I couldn’t tell you the last time I opened it because nobody I follow is there, and I don’t really care about following general topics or hashtags.

      As opposed to a site like Reddit, the content is what matters, and I can get that content anywhere (RSS feeds, blogs, here, etc)

    • CrimeRadish@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but people will. And the article explains how this can lead to the “death” of the open-protocol version.