Feedback welcome! Here’s the TL;DR list

  1. Listen more to more Black people
  2. Post less – and think before you post
  3. Call in, call out, and/or report anti-Blackness when you see it
  4. Support Black people and Black-led instances and projects

Other suggestions?

  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I always thought of beehaw as an inclusive instance.

    most of the issue is and has always been off-instance users, who for a variety of reasons (some intentional, some because of UI/user experience/just plain unawareness due to the nuances of federation) tend to respond to threads like these in ways that our on-instance users don’t. to combat this we may or may not switch to a whitelist in the future instead of a blacklist, which is what we have now; if that occurs, it will probably be when we move to Sublinks

      • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        there is no phrasing to be redone; it’s the official wording, i am decidedly not a person offended by the whitelist/blacklist terminology, and i think if you can only racialize this verbiage when you hear it that’s weirdness on your part. i’m sure there are some people who have problems with it, but i genuinely don’t know that i’ve ever–as a black person–thought for a second about this outside of white people getting offended on my behalf. certainly not when online spaces struggle with so much actual racism, ignorance, and dismissiveness of those prior two things (as has been on display in this thread).

        • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          Seeing how society is consciously trying to move beyond white inherently being good and black inherently being bad, I think it’s perfectly right for someone to ask you to check your verbage. Just switch to allowlist/denylist like the rest of tech has done.

          • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            see: “i think if you can only racialize this verbiage when you hear it that’s weirdness on your part.” and again i think this very much people wanting to die on an unimportant hill that they can feel sanctimonious/virtue-signally about and scold people about instead of tackling actual manifestations of racism in the tech field.

            i cannot stress this enough: if people want to address something that materially affects black people and other minorities in tech, that should probably start with the omnipresent discriminatory hiring practices and normalized racism–not terminology that requires racialization to be problematic. (and it should probably start with not checking actual black people’s opinions on this subject like they’re the reason any of this is a problem!)

            • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              3 months ago

              actual black people’s opinions

              But I’m black too though and I don’t remember voting for you as our representative. Which is to say, yes, there’s certainly other things we can do to tackle racism, but tackling ground level stuff like inherently painting black as bad and/or negative is part of that. You’re free to disagree, but so would Candace Owens, so being black means nothing when you’re on the wrong side of the issue.

              • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                there’s certainly other things we can do to tackle racism, but tackling ground level stuff like inherently painting black as bad and/or negative is part of that.

                i simply do not think that this is racist or worth caring about unless you make it (at which point i would argue yet again the problem is internalized, not with the phrasing used), and i think this is reflected in how the overwhelming majority of people who care about this are white people who want to feel good about themselves without doing anything that would actually tackle racism at the source or challenge their whiteness and how they might benefit from it. to me “whitelist/blacklist” is extremely representative of contemporary slacktivism–stuff that feels good but is functionally a red herring toward material progress on these issues. (notice, for instance, how much time we’re wasting on even debating if this is valuable when we could be doing anything else. and how we’re doing this in a thread where some people are just unambiguously being racist.)

                • Iapar@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  If it is not that important to you but to someone else to feel better, it would be in the spirit of the instance to change the terminology, wouldn’t it?

                  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    You’re exemplifying OP’s #1 and #2: a black person, who’s in a position to know what people will/won’t take offence with (since she’s a mod), is using the terms whitelist/blacklist, and telling you “it’s fine”.

                    But you’re still trying to argue it on hypothetical grounds? Shut up and listen to her dammit.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’ve seen increasing usage of “allowlist/denylist” .