I’m rather curious to see how the EU’s privacy laws are going to handle this.

(Original article is from Fortune, but Yahoo Finance doesn’t have a paywall)

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t true at all - first, we don’t know things like a database knows things.

    Second, they do retain individual facts in the same sort of way we know things, through relationships. The difference is, for us the Eiffel tower is a concept, and the name, appearance, and everything else about it are relationships - we can forget the name of something but remember everything else about it. They’re word based, so the name is everything for them - they can’t learn facts about a building then later learn the name of it and retain the facts, but they could later learn additional names for it

    For example, they did experiments using some visualization tools and edited it manually. They changed the link been Eiffel tower and Paris to Rome, and the model began to believe it was in Rome. You could then ask what you’d see from the Eiffel tower, and it’d start listing landmarks like the coliseum

    So you absolutely could have it erase facts - you just have to delete relationships or scramble details. It just might have unintended side effects, and no tools currently exist to do this in an automated fashion

    For humans, it’s much harder - our minds use layers of abstraction and aren’t a unified set of info. That mean you could zap knowledge of the Eiffel tower, and we might forget about it. But then thinking about Paris, we might remember it and rebuild certain facts about it, then thinking about world fairs we might remember when it was built and by who, etc