• Fitik@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip Pretty cool, but what about Servo? Why not work on it instead?

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d love to hear your thoughts on why you feel the GPLv3 is better than the BSD2-clause license LadyBird is using.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        GPLv3 makes a company publish the source under the same license. That means no Vivaldi, Chrome, Edge or any other spyware ad ridden browsers. I don’t think we need more lock in.

        • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I understand your reasoning, but I think your logic is flawed. If Ladybird is GPLv3, then browsers will continue to use Chromium base which helps the Chrome monopoly. By making it BSD, it will help others adopt it.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            We don’t need that much adoption we just need a engine that is capable of not screwing over everyone. We already have plenty of proprietary browsers.

            Admittedly BSD may help Ladybug get more funding and development efforts.