• Bowen@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’ll need to be a serious rethink about the safety design.

    The owner is on record saying he thinks safety regulations are bogus an he’s actively looked to cutting corners because you can’t live in safety our whole life.

    This whole thing was a stupid mess. I can’t even really muster any sympathy for this situation because everyone made boneheaded decisions every step of the process. Including controlling thrust and control surfaces with a wireless PC controller because you’re too much of a spedthrift to spend 10k on some deep sea cable glands and build an actual fly by wire system for your 1.25 million dollar trips to the bottom of the oceans.

    • kryostar@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wait whaaaaaaat? They seriously used wireless PC controller for thrust and control surfaces?

      Oh my god. If that’s true that might be the most brain dead thing I’ve ever read today. Can you please give me a source, I have to know more about this now. :0

      Edit: holy shit. I’m watching SomeOrdinaryGamers’ video.

      • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t speak to the sub, but many Navy ships were retrofitted with systems to be controlled by XBox 360 controllers. Turns out training new people on the controller had huge improvements over the old systems.

        EOD also has robots controlled by a “game controller”. So do many drones.

        This isn’t a “crazy” thing to do. (except if it’s wireless. Keep that cable)

        https://thegamingwatcher.com/pages/articles/best-xbox/2023/6/21/gamepads-military-xbox-controllers-gaming

        • kryostar@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I absolutely understand that. But that wireless part id what gets me man. Why add so many points of failure? I’m just so mind blown that they were okay with using such off the shelf components.

          I’ve watched the Deep sea challenge documentary maybe 6-7 years ago… and IIRC everything on that sub had to be rigorously tested and custom made. They made sure that the sub was prepared for the worst. They reduced the no of failure points as much as they could. “Always assume anything or everything that can go wrong, will go wrong” was kind of their philosophy.

          So I always assumed that, every other sub and expedition will be treated the same. It’s like sending astronauts to the moon.