• niisyth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I tried PopOS and the pop store is not the best, and gnome is too foreign for someone coming from windows.

    And also, too fiddly to make it work with a number of third party extensions vs the customization being built in.

    KDE is heavier but also seems more streamlined and Cinnamon is fairly decent too.

    • BaalInvokerA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I think Gnome VS KDE it’s just a POV

      Your argument makes sense that KDE and Cinnamon can be welcoming to Windows users. However I can argue that it can also make these newcomers to keep a “windows-like” mindset and that can be frustrating.

      If a newcomer comes to Gnome, due to it’s totally different paradigm, it may induce this newcomer to have an open mind and, therefore, be more welcoming to linux experience.

      I don’t think one argument or the other is right or wrong. I think both arguments are valid and that’s just a different perspective. I, personally, think that a totally new paradigm is good to newcomers, but be free to disagree, since you understand that there is no right or wrong regarding this topic

      • niisyth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I totally see your point and I tried GNOME first to have a uniquely Linux experience. I do agree with you. But the inflexibility of GNOME by default made it a much harder flip. I tried it with PopOS too, after using Debian for a while.

        Plus tbh, I don’t think with still how much you need to use the terminal for linux, anyone would be mistaken in the transition. Windows has kludge from the 90s for their settings and linux still needs terminal.