• NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      3 days ago

      What news station hasn’t lied before? Fox was being honest when the Hunter Biden laptop story came out while the others flat out lied about it

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        What news station hasn’t lied before?

        There’s a gigantic difference between

        A) sometimes accidentally saying something untrue due to sloppy work and then issuing a retraction when you find out or someone finds out for you

        B) sometimes accidentally or deliberately saying something untrue due to editorial bias and then issuing a retraction

        C) Having a deliberate strategy of lying on purpose to further an agenda while constantly accusing everyone else of the same

        Almost all of the news outlets in the world do A and B, rarely in most cases.

        Faux News have been doing C all day every day since 1996.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          And don’t forget the biggest difference of all, saying in court that they aren’t News but a “News entertainment network”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    So, a couple of things… Why this is coming from Fox and why I’ll allow it:

    “The spot, shared first with Fox News on Wednesday…”

    It SEEMS the Biden campaign CHOSE Fox to release this information. It’s not a matter of their biased coverage, the campaign wants Fox to be the outlet here.

    Second, reading it over, the story is remarkably editorial free. Sticks to the facts.

      • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        Obviously not or they would’ve never agreed to take it on, so it definitely happened. Most agreed to allow it to happen and some disagreed with allowing it.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      country in the world invade our Southern border, taking a week off work to prepare for a debate (who’s running the country?).

      A good president can do that because a good president actually appoints good people that can be trusted to run things instead of a bunch of sycophants

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You do know that illegal crossings are down significantly, right? Are you crediting Biden with that? Biden is not censoring anything. Trump is doing his best to get himself locked up by states, not the federal government, dingus. Trump spent a third of his time golfing and STILL managed to fuck things up horribly. Did you just run this through AI and it hallucinated garbage?

      • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not the Federal government huh? That’s why Bidens number 3 at the justice department just happened to demote himself down to Braggs office right before charging Trump and then prosecuting him. Why would anyone do something like that unless they were directed to by their boss? By now, you should know the MSM is lying to you, especially after the debate. If you still think they’re being honest with you, you’re living in denial

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not the Federal government huh? That’s why Bidens number 3 at the justice department just happened to demote himself down to Braggs office right before charging Trump

          You do realize that is not proof, right? Just because you do not know the reason does not mean the reason is due to your whacko conspiracy theory. And you also realize that a jury convicted him, right?

          • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Proof enough for me, unless someone could tell me 1 other reason why he would demote himself down 3 levels, less pay, less benefits, lower job title. And what are the chances of coincidence he ended up in that court, right before prosecuting Trump? Zero! You’re just very naive to think he wasn’t put in there for the purpose of prosecuting Trump

            • SeaJ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              You don’t seem to understand what proof is. Bragg was a professor before his current position so I’m not sure you know the order of events.

              You are looking for something that isn’t there because you want to believe that Trump was somehow wronged. He knew what he was doing was illegal. A jury of his peers (even someone who got their news only from Truth Social and Twitter) agreed and that those crimes rose to the level of a felony.