reuters.com
www.reuters.com
  • sinovictorchan@lemmygrad.ml
    22·
    5 days ago

    Given the history of false flag terrorism by Pax Americana and the lack of unprovoked military aggression by Russia in Ukraine, I could believe that the USA and its allies were behind the attack of the report. Further evidences include the demographic Russian majority in Crimea, the pro-Russian unification by Ukrainians who have Russian ethnicity which suggested that Crimea citizens supported the annexation by Russia, and the 8 years of genocidal campaign by the Euro-maiden Kyiv government against an ethnic minority group before Russian military intervention.

    • KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml
      17·
      5 days ago

      Considering how Russia hasn’t really been reacting to most of what the US and co has done against them, the US likely is confident nothing will come out of it like in most of the other times they did things against Russia, thus, the US will probably escalate this within days. Like many of the other times.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
        14·
        5 days ago

        There’s little reason for Russia to rock the boat at the moment given that they will win if the status quo continues. Direct escalation would make things more unpredictable. However, what I can see happening is Russia sending advanced weapons to Iran, DPRK, Syria, and Yemen.

        • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
          6·
          4 days ago

          Direct escalation would make things more unpredictable.

          This is the U.S. strategy – to provoke Russia into a response that will turn more than Europe against it.

    • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
      30·
      5 days ago

      Translation: It’s ok to be killing civilians when they have passports from countries we don’t like! These are excellent news! And even better, we get to hear Russia whining like a little baby about its dead people! Man, what a great chance this event has been to show off my moral superiority on the internet!

      • LeniX@lemmygrad.ml
        27·
        5 days ago

        The difference between libs and chuds at this point in history is in their ability to hide their blood thirst. Also - history starts when CNN, NBC, ABC, DEF, XYZ, DoReMiFaSolLaSi News tells them it ought to start. No mention of 2 US-orchestrated color revolutions in Ukraine, no mention of Nazifying Ukraine since the 90s, no mention of crushing all anti-Maidan anti-coup dissent by those fascists in 2014, no mentions of UAF shelling civilians in the Donbass for 8 straight years… Nothing. Goldfish memory and bloodlust

        • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
          21·
          5 days ago

          At this point, most of them are aware of this stuff. They just choose to not remember them. This is deliberate because it allows them to reconcile their racism, their support for Nazis, and their obedience to their governments, with the fact that they are supposed to be against these 3 things.

        • SadArtemis@lemmygrad.ml
          14·
          5 days ago

          It really is interesting, isn’t it- frankly, I see the libs as not only more insidious (as they have always been) but typically far more dangerous than the average chud nowadays, and this is as a staunch progressive myself.

          As I see it- capitalism has managed to produce a ideological force more odious than the old-school imperialists, or the fascists. A force unhindered by petty things like national preservation (or preservation of anything other than the individual), and which somehow manages to claim itself more virtuous than the aforementioned ideologies- while at the same time (in contrast to both, for all their faults and the fact theirs were terrible) having no true values whatsoever.

          • LeniX@lemmygrad.ml
            3·
            5 days ago

            I meant “post-Soviet Ukraine”, for the sake of simplicity. But if we go this far - let’s also put the Austrian-German puppet (“UNR”), operation Belladonna and the original Banderites on top of all that. There’s little point though - they are still ignorant af.

      • SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml
        1·
        3 days ago

        Is programming.dev for programmers and such? Because if so I can’t say I’m surprised, what with the whole undermining humanities and pushing STEM.