• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    5 months ago

    Three out of four of those corners (including the one in which the gummies are a misdemeanor) are also within the Navajo Nation. Kinda feels like that tribal jurisdiction ought to matter.

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      They do. And for most purposes each reservation is it’s own little defacto nation. They aren’t truly, but definitely in spirit lol.

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        They don’t necessarily. Historically they didn’t have jurisdiction over non-tribal members. Now there are some detainment powers, but it is not 100% clear still.

      • Eyelessoozeguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Each nation has its own agreement with the USA that defines these things, it’s weird. I think it’s in Wisconsin where tribe members retain hunting and fishing rights to a lake sold as a private lake, when cops showed up, they had to let them fish and hunt or the land would be returned to the tribe. As per the agreement from long ago.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ummm that is a sold sort of. It is more clear now, but is history tribal police couldn’t reinforce the law or even detain non tribal members. After a supreme court ruling and a new federal law tribal place have some power over non-tribal members. But not to necessarily to the extent of other local law enforcement.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      In his order, abortion is: Homicide after 15 weeks and before a 24-hour waiting period, Legal at your convenience, Legal at your convenience but only if the mother is in danger, Homicide after 18 weeks and before a 72-hour waiting period.

      The only way to perform an abortion on that spot that is 100% legal is if it is done before 15 weeks, after waiting 72 hours, and the mother’s life is in danger.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Clouds will form over the spot as a warm wind blows in from the southeast. Flecks of rain will fall and a slow rumble will build from below as the ground shakes and a hole appears from the fallen ground. A representative of each will be sent: a sheriff, an artist, a socially conscious libertarian, and a racist.

      They will each give you one gift and then the sheriff arrests you and takes you to be judged by the racists. The others watch on in quiet disapproval, to the abortion or the arrest it isn’t clear. The racist then says “As foretold, the skies open and you’re on trial in another state.”

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Going out of your way to have an abortion exactly there?

      That sounds just like a satanic withcraft ritual.

      Not sure if there more or less steps, maybe it just IS considering abortion used to be a job for the local herbalist women.

  • thejoker954@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    5 months ago

    Man my brain is toast.

    I was scratching my head wondering which state would ban gummy bears and why no one in the comments seemed curious about that.

    Then I realized weed gummies.

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    5 months ago

    His pockets are only in two states each. He may be in physical possession of illegal drugs for that one state, but the drugs themselves may not be there. How would that be ruled?

  • ickplant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    5 months ago

    Love me some Four Corners mischief. There is usually a food truck there serving Native American frybread - delicious!!!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do they sell “Indian tacos?” I had that when I was working at a local TV station shooting news footage of a regional powwow and it was awesome. Taco ingredients on the frybread you’re talking about.

      I’m not meaning to be culturally insensitive. They called them Indian tacos, not me.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, American Indians prefer to be called Indians, not native Americans. You’re not being insensitive.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          In my experience, there seems to be a lot of disagreement on that point, but it is not my ethnicity, so I don’t feel like I’m right to speak on any of their behalves.

        • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I live in a population area with a lot of native Americans, and I’ve literally never heard that before. I only hear a preference toward, “native” or “indigenous”.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            have you ever asked them? My wife works on reservations. They unanimously want to be called Indian. CGP Grey has a video on it as well I’m pretty sure. And I think it’s pretty telling that the agency is called the Bureau of Indian Affairs and not the Bureau of Native American affairs. https://www.usa.gov/agencies/bureau-of-indian-affairs

            We’ve had plenty of reform of sports team names, you’d think they’d want to reform the actual federal agency name if it wasn’t what they wanted it to be called.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I generally try to avoid the whole thing and call any people who were there before the colonials came ‘indigenous,’ which applies to the peoples of Australia and Polynesia as it does the Americas.

            • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah, I have. I wonder if it’s a difference of reservation versus non-reservation? I don’t really interact with people from the reservations, just people that have moved into the city. Really interesting, I’ll look for that video.

          • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            because Indian can be confused with a billion+ other ppl in the world.
            the 'ol “feather or dot” question

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Holy shit I haven’t thought about frybread in like, a decade and now you made me think about it. How dare you.

    • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I miss fry bread sooo much. I always try to tell people it’s like funnel cake but simpler. I haven’t had it since I’ve been to Havasupai.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      “Those where theoretical gummies to proof a point”

      Thats why they are “in his pocket” and now openly On display.

      Could also argue my left leg and pocket didnt cross the border, only my right did.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Habeus Corpus. Any judge would laugh a prosecutor out of the court if this was the only evidence.

      Then they would probably be fired.

      • PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        What about credit card statements showing purchase history from a dispensary, smartphone location data of him going to said dispensary, Google account search history of searching for “dispensary near me” and ai facial recognition - assisted cctv footage of him buying it? I’m pretty sure the government can get that stuff fairly easily.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          “Yes your honor but is there any evidence that my client was actually in possession of the marijuana”

  • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I think of the Simpson’s episode with sideshow Bob and the 5 corners. I shoot you from here, the bullet passes through there, you die in x and fall into …

    Edit: if to of

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it would be pretty much impossible to prove he had gummies in his pocket at the time. I also don’t know that Stephan Pastis is the right person to make an example of.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        he also didn’t specify what kind of gummies

        They could have been caffeine gummies and he was talking about them being illegal in the eyes of the LDS church in Utah.

  • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s either more or less than 25%, depending on whether he has the gummies in his left, right or back pocket.