• Cowbee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Police are largely a gang of thugs, they serve Capital, not people.

    Solving root causes makes police far less important.

    • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      So what do you propose for solving root causes and enforcing regulations? You have a Disney movie I could watch?

      • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Expanding social programs and employing social workers instead of police for mental health crisis events.

        Crime happens because of poverty and desparation for the most part, not because some people are born evil.

        Socialism would eliminate the biggest sources of poverty.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        More Zach Snyder;

        Marxists argue that the economic system of capitalism itself causes crime. The whole system is based on the exploitation of the working class by the ruling class, leading to the ever-increasing wealth of one class and ever-increasing poverty of the other. source

        • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Kewl article. So your fantasy societies have no crime therefore no need for police. I’ll make sure to bookmark that laterz

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Unlike the fantasy we live in now, where the police are not obligated to protect you?

            The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect. In its 1989 decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, the justices ruled that a social services department had no duty to protect a young boy from his abusive father. In 2005’sCastle Rock v. Gonzales*, *a woman sued the police for failing to protect her from her husband after he violated a restraining order and abducted and killed their three children. Justices said the police had no such duty.

            • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              You are right, both of those cases were directly related to crimes caused by capitalist societies. Police were never intended to protect you, only to enforce laws and arrest those who break those laws, they aren’t hired bodyguards or private investigators.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        I mean, most individual crime comes from poor socioeconomic conditions. People don’t feel the need to steal shit, for instance, if they aren’t starving. Scarcity (be it real, physical scarcity of goods, or a perceived scarcity in, say, opportunity) creates motive for crime. Reduce scarcity, reduce crime.