• randint@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not deliberately starting shit. All I’m doing is engaging in discussions by leaving replies to comments I don’t agree with. From my observation, this is also what many Hexbears are doing. When Hexbears do this, it’s fine because they “don’t have downvotes” and “have been very active for 3 years.” When I do this, apparently I am “deliberately starting shit.”

    I am well aware of the fact that my post and comment history is public.

    I did not defend the apologia by Zenz. You are deliberately misinterpreting my words. What I said was although his apologia were unacceptable, that does not invalidate his opinions on other topics. To make it extra clear, I did not defend the apologia by Zenz. I also do not condone what the Nazis did. What you said in your comment is slander and hurts my reputation. I would like to politely request that you take down the allegations.

    Though Lee Teng-hui did deny the Rape of Nanking, the “war crime denier” was the first democratically elected president of Taiwan, which makes him one of the pivotal figures in the history of Taiwan. I certainly don’t agree with his viewpoints on the Rape of Nanking, but I still respect him just for the fact that he brought change to the political landscape in Taiwan.

      • randint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did not defend Nazi apologia. I did defend Zenz on his opinions about the genocide against Uyghurs in China.

        • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          His opinions about the “genocide”? The fact that you recognise that they are entirely opinions and not facts just shows how inauthentic the claims are.

            • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s not what “I did defend Zenz on his opinions” means at all. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you’ll lie about what you said only a few centimetres away?

            • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Neat! I personally give a shit about facts rather than what some dumbass loser thinks might be happening despite all evidence to the contrary. The Washington Post is a rag owned by Jeff Bezos, acting like it is in any way reputable is laughable

      • randint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, some of my comments are done with the aim of making hexbear look bad. But ultimately what’s the difference? You already look bad.

          • randint@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            A Hexbear calling me out for being a troll? Calling my claims rooted on dishonest bullshit? Wow.

            • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              33
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s funny because calling you out on your dishonest and racist shit is the original source of your grudge against us

              Now you come to our site for the explicit and sole reason of starting shit with us

              And you act indignant at being called out for your behavior once again and act like you’re vnidicated

              logout

              • randint@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                As I have already clarified multiple times, I am not here to start shit. I am here to express my opinions, just like the hexbears do on those news posts on China.

            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              ·
              1 year ago

              you should stop making ad hominem attacks and instead watch this countdown for an important message then click the spoiler below afterwards countdown

              Don't click until the 60 seconds are up, silly!

              Ad nom on deez nutz ayy lmao

      • randint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did I say anything wrong? Was the process democratic? Yes. Was he elected? Yes. Was his title “president”? Yes. Did this happen in Taiwan? Also yes.

      • randint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hexbear’s reputation is worse though. Look at how many instances decided to defederate from you.

          • randint@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I love how you guys are intentionally ignorant of the mainstream opinion about Hexbear. You look at the servers you got defederated from, talk shit about them, and pretend that you have not lost anything of value. This is the ultimate sour grapes mentality.

            • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Aww boo hol we don’t get to interact with libs like you that spread misinformation long after they’re been showed to be liars? We don’t get to interact with more people like you that thinks they’re deserving of respect despite acting in bad faith themselves? We don’t get to interact with idiots like you that somehow think an opinion based on nothing but lies and hearsay is something that should be respected? That’s really too bad

        • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hold that it is bad as far as we are concerned if a person, a political party, an army or a school is not attacked by the enemy, for in that case it would definitely mean that we have sunk to the level of the enemy. It is good if we are attacked by the enemy, since it proves that we have drawn a clear line of demarcation between the enemy and ourselves. It is still better if the enemy attacks us wildly and paints us as utterly black and without a single virtue; it demonstrates that we have not only drawn a clear line of demarcation between the enemy and ourselves but achieved a great deal in our work.

        • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          No one here cares because they’re filled with losers like you. It is a privilege to federate with us. Blahaj was on some transphobic and ableist bullshit, so they lost that privilege.

    • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      What you said in your comment is slander and hurts my reputation. I would like to politely request that you take down the allegations.

      It’s not slander if it’s true.