• Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Comes out to 4350 sq ft, vs 40,000 for an acre. So, a tiny bit more than 0.1 acres, but not quite 0.11.

        • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Sigh, imperial measurements. I forgot it was 208x208’, I had calculated it at 200x200’.

          Seriously, imperial measurements are just awful.

          • pbbananaman@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            If you don’t fight it and accept that imperial is designed with base 12 and not base 10, everything makes more sense. Measurements across all of imperial are to be cut into 12, 6, 4, 3, or 2.

            Sometime base 12 works really nicely, especially outside of a lab, when you want to be able to have as many options for division easily as possible.

              • pbbananaman@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                I get that people like to be stubborn about this but there are very real and intuitive reasons that decimals don’t make sense everywhere. Consider how intuitive telling time using “kiloseconds” and decimals might be.

                The right tool needs to be used for the right job. I am a scientist. In the lab, metric is fantastic as it allows for precision recording and I don’t care about intuition.

                It’s not a point of pride to use one system over another. For example, in America we use both systems in the right contexts. I am happily able to fluidly switch between what’s most appropriate for the situation. I get that context/code switching is generally difficult but I think it’s an overall value add.

    • Fluke@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 days ago

      Eyeballing looks like the house couldn’t be more than 18x30 feet, or ~540 sq ft. Probably less in reality. Tiny home territory. Smaller than most single wide trailer homes. The doors as drawn must be for hobbits. Fun picture just the same. I love the urban homestead explosion and hope it never stops.