- cross-posted to:
- batepapo
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
- security@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- batepapo
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
- security@lemmy.ml
Q. Is this really as harmful as you think?
A. Go to your parents house, your grandparents house etc and look at their Windows PC, look at the installed software in the past year, and try to use the device. Run some antivirus scans. There’s no way this implementation doesn’t end in tears — there’s a reason there’s a trillion dollar security industry, and that most problems revolve around malware and endpoints.
deleted by creator
No major corp I’m aware of is excited about these changes. Legal especially would like there to be the minimum records retention required by law, and a months long AI searchable database of individual user actions on a PC is a nightmare scenario for them.
If the IT departments of any major corp allows anyone within their network to enable this feature, they and everyone the work for need a permanent waning label for idiocy and utter incompetence attached to their resume.
Can I forward your comment to my IT team? Because they’ve done worse than that already :(
I don’t know, if I was IT decision-making and I worked for a company I didn’t particularly like I might install this for the executive stratosphere and hope for subpoenas.
Can you elaborate on what “subpoenable information” means. Like I have a vague idea but im not super clear if thats like a legal term with special considerations or whatever. Elaboration would be helpful.
Not OP but the scenario described is say… A company and a specific manager gets sued for harassment. The plaintiff can be entitled to discovery related to the complaint, and that could now include the searchable screenshot database from the managers computer showing all the clear evidence that he harassed the plaintiff. Nightmare scenario for legal departments of companies.
On the other hand, this makes it much easier for a corporation to spy on its employees, so I think at least some of them are in favor of this.
If employees are using the corporate’s computers, they can already see everything the employees do, they don’t need this new window feature to do it
That is by no means necessarily the case. For example, if a notebook is taken into the field and is not on the LAN.
A lot of companies are implementing better VPN tech (like SD-WAN, Nebula by Slack, etc), or at the least Microsoft Intune to ensure your corporate laptop is reachable anytime it’s connected to the internet.
My work laptop is a brick until it establishes a VPN tunnel back to the home network. There are ways to ensure the device only works how the company wants it to.
Windows has some kind of built-in VPN feature that auto starts and will otherwise not give you any network access. Add on top of that some corporate firewall and you basically can’t sneeze around your laptop without IT knowing.
Hmmmm it depends… Are they going to make more money by spying on employees than they’ll lose in lawsuits?
I think COVID WFH policies proved the majority of us do not need someone breathing down our necks to perform
And yet management is desperate to end WFH policies and has done so in many companies.
To justify their own existence
deleted by creator
If you’re suspected of something and law enforcement can get a subpoena, you’ll have to hand over the contents of your microsoft keylogger, actually microsoft will hand over your contents from their keylogger.
It means it’s the kind of stuff that law enforcement would require a warrant in order to obtain.
The damage is mitigated by the fact it only recalls last 3 days by default
deleted by creator
Forensic data recovery. How many 500GB drives ship to PCs that never use more than 20% of that?
“By default” meaning it can be changed.
Then someone in the company gets their device compromised, and security starts looking what happened on the device that time. “We’d have that data, but it was deleted yesterday because of the retention policy on recall” -answer from that new guy in IT dept. Security then reminds that the company policy requires minimum 30 days retention for all logging of security events.
deleted by creator
The article references family, domestic violence, employers, and fraudsters but doesn’t really focus on legal liability.
deleted by creator
Before you said that it was specifically addressed. Interesting shift of the goal post.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator