• Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Right. The reductive part is assuming this problem would be solved by polygamy, when realistically there’s nothing at all showing that’s the case, except that there’s a guy who wants multiple women for different reasons. We only know that he wants that, but nothing of the motives and desires of the others, and thus it’s reductive to say “polygamy fixes this”.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your change in verbiage from polyamory to polygamy demonstrates you have no interest in critical inquiry, you just want to argue.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And your complete dismissal over a simple typographic error demonstrates that you never intended to have an actual discussion. I had actually edited my post to polygamy because I had, inaccurately, recalled you using that word. At the end of the day, polyamory and polygamy, yes they’re distinct. It doesn’t change my statement regardless of which is used, however.