fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-21 month agoHe came with receiptsmander.xyzimagemessage-square184fedilinkarrow-up11.81Karrow-down116file-text
arrow-up11.8Karrow-down1imageHe came with receiptsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-21 month agomessage-square184fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·1 month agoSuccessful writers generally don’t just make stuff up. They do plenty of research.
minus-squarepflanzenregal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 month agoYou can’t just compare creative writing to writing a paper.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·1 month agoTrue, but you can compare writing 4000 novels a year with being able to write 80 papers a few pages long in 2.5 and say that both are possible.
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 month agoHe didn’t write all those papers. He put his name on them. He also finds it worth his time to publicly argue with a pig in shit, so there’s that.
minus-squarecandybrie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 month agoThe writing of the paper is generally a trivial part of the work. Each technical paper is supposed to be a succinct summary of months or years of technical work.
Successful writers generally don’t just make stuff up. They do plenty of research.
You can’t just compare creative writing to writing a paper.
True, but you can compare writing 4000 novels a year with being able to write 80 papers a few pages long in 2.5 and say that both are possible.
He didn’t write all those papers. He put his name on them. He also finds it worth his time to publicly argue with a pig in shit, so there’s that.
The writing of the paper is generally a trivial part of the work. Each technical paper is supposed to be a succinct summary of months or years of technical work.