Faced with high mortgage rates, cost-constrained Americans are embracing smaller homes

  • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the fuck? It’s called a starter home. How is the existence of sane-sized singe-family or mutli-family homes supposed to be a bad thing?

      • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true, I was criticising the weird tone of the article for implying it was some great burden to only have one or two large dedicated living spaces and 100sqft bedrooms rather than three and 200. It would be a whole lot less unnatainable if 2 bedroom/1 shower, 800sqft units in a multiplex or 5-over-one were the default rather than half the size of what this article is trying to present as some bizarre abberation.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I will say, as someone in a house with just one shower, when you have a teenage daughter, things can get accidentally awkward. I wouldn’t complain if we had a second. But overall I’m fine with smaller houses. We rented a two story house when we first moved to this town and we had a room we literally had nothing to put in. We just left it empty. No one needs a big house unless they have a big family.

          • Phen
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I live in Brazil. One of the classic questions we have to answer when the government is doing a census is how many bathrooms our home has. Along with other data it is one of the best indicators of how you’re doing financially. Nobody wants to have only one bathroom but nobody is building a second bathroom if they can’t afford to either. Number of phones and cars and that stuff can’t be trusted because people often buy those without being able to afford it.

            Everything else in the house can be expanded with just some extra wood and room, but bathrooms don’t lie.

          • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Privacy locks exist and plenty of people manage.

            I mean ensuites are nice, but they are a luxury. Especially for a first home of a single person or a new couple.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You clearly don’t have a teenager if you think they always remember to do things like lock the bathroom door.

              • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I live in a multi family dwelling with 6 people including 3 teenagers with one bathroom and there’s never been an issue.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well then you obviously have superior teenagers to mine. How lucky for you.

                  Why you’re suggesting that my awkward situations haven’t been awkward I don’t know. Maybe you know me better than I do?

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s good that people live in smaller houses now? What the fuck do you have against working class families?

      If corporations and conservatives have their way, the working class will just live in tents in front of their factory jobs.

      • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is good that the houses are becoming less gigantic now, and I have nothing against working-class families.

        From the article:

        In December, Brad and Julie Redman downsized from their more-than 7,000 square-foot custom-built home to a 3,400 square-foot semi-custom model in Westfield, Ind., after their children left home.

        Since 2018, the average unit size for new housing starts has decreased 10% nationally to 2,420 square feet

        Sonia Mendez, a real-estate agent in the area, said she has seen builders increase construction of 1,500 to 1,700 square-foot townhomes.

  • Chocrates@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Paywalled, but american homes are too damn big. Why can’t I find an 800sq foot house? I don’t need that much space.