i think the suggestion itself is not nsfw so it shouldn’t be tagged nsfw. Anyway, I have noticed trillions of times now that there is an everpresent issue among people trying to generate nsfw images that are not specifically Anthro nor Anime that the HD and Realistic model or models seem badly or not trained on NSFW content. It is a question I and probably everyone with an ai art generator has had asked of us. Also, tons of people generate NSFW images. I believe, as far as models perchance text-to-image could have, realistic nsfw is the one that currently is the biggest missing model that, if present, would appeal to most people.

    • allo@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      3·
      6 months ago

      oh fascinating. on the other fediverse instance i’m in i was having a discussion with an admin of the entire fediverse instance and they brought up an issue which was that some people go around downvoting everything having to do with ai (the conversation had started with an ai art community with mysterious spammed downvotes). So that is your organization basically. Do you have a name for yourselves?

      Fun to finally meet someone of this type. You aren’t antifa, nor anarchists, but the closest thing I find when looking it up is ‘Luddite’ which refers to people hating technology in general. But that isn’t what you are doing, and also Luddite doesn’t seem like a term a Luddite would be proud of. Is there some equivalent of ‘antifa’ or ‘anarchist’ that you proudly call yourselves xcept for people activistly against ai? I’m going to ask on the other instance, but curious if you have a term.

      • strangething@pawb.socialEnglish
        2·
        6 months ago

        It’s not that I hate AI in general, but that Perchance isn’t (just) an AI prompt builder.

        As for the terminology for AI haters, I think the proper term is “art lover.” AI is trained on stolen art, and its output is used instead of paying a human artist.

        • Ashenthorn@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          5 months ago

          As for the terminology for AI haters, I think the proper term is “art lover.” AI is trained on stolen art, and its output is used instead of paying a human artist.

          Artists have always had apprentices who were dedicated to learning their master’s style.

          This training would include learning/using the same brushes/equipment, lighting, brush strokes, etc. down to sometimes microscopic detail.

          Some would title their works like: “<Title> - After <Original Artist Name>” or “In the Style of <Original Artist Name>”… others wouldn’t bother with attribution, but may have gone on to become masters themselves. Some AI art prompts in fact include “(in the style of <Artist Name>)”

          When looking at paintings, I have honestly mistaken Julie Bell paintings for Boris Vallejo works before noticing her signature. Is Julie an artist? or just a thief?

          Is Bob Ross an artist? or a just a thief of Bill Alexander’s work? I have (re)created oil paintings after learning Bill/Bob’s wet-on-wet (Alla Prima) technique. Can I sell them as “my own”? or am I just a thief?

          • strangething@pawb.socialEnglish
            1·
            5 months ago

            Let me repeat myself: AI is trained on stolen art, and its output is used instead of paying a human artist.

            If you’re learning to be an artist, by all means copy away. Don’t pretend that prompting a computer program is the same thing.