• PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s the reason? Using more electricity than whole nations just to move some money around hardly seems worth the cost.

    • Tramort@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because the stakeholders become the new central bank, with all the same motivations and conflicts of interest. You end up with a “staked class” and an “unstaked class”.

      This is a contributing factor to why ethereum can be rolled back: because the stakeholders didn’t like it.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bitcoin essentially has the same thing though — it’s just that the “staked class” is those who have built power-devouring ASIC facilities to compute lots of hashes. Get enough of them together, and you can roll back transactions via a Sybil attack, just as you can with organized action by stakeholders in a proof-of-stake cryptocurrency.