Foreign secretary’s call comes after group releases video of British-Israeli hostage it says died after being wounded in Israeli airstrike

David Cameron has urged the BBC to describe Hamas as a terrorist organisation, reviving an accusation that the corporation shies away from a valid description of the Islamist group that is holding Israeli hostages.

The UK foreign secretary told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg that the organisation should reconsider its guidelines in light of a video released by Hamas showing the British-Israeli hostage Nadav Popplewell, who the group said had died in Gaza.

Hamas released a statement on Saturday saying the 51-year-old had died after being wounded in an Israeli airstrike a month ago. The video showed him with a black eye.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They are, in fact, allowed to print anything they want. They are not beholden to the government. That’s a simple fact.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not sure how you think that changes anything that I said and makes them beholden to the government, but okay.

        I’d think the fact that they aren’t doing what David Cameron wants them to do proves you wrong, but you seem to think your “research” trumps reality, so…

        • Murvel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, the BBC is clearly regulated by the government, while you claim that is not the case due to ‘simple facts’…

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            The simple fact being that David Cameron told them to call Hamas terrorists and they said no. Read the article. If they are beholden to the government, how is that possible?

            • Murvel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              They are not beholden to the government. That’s a simple fact.

              Hm, well see, that’s not what you referred the ‘simple fact’ to be is it?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Again- if that is not a fact, why are they allowed to go against what David Cameron is telling them to do?

                • Murvel@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Because David Cameron cannot personally dictate the state…

                  One thing I’ve learnt in life is the value of accepting when I’m in the wrong.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    So… you’re saying that the BBC must be beholden to the state in terms of messaging, but a senior cabinet member does not? That’s really your argument?