mondoman712@lemmy.ml to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoA new trolley eralemmy.worldimagemessage-square156fedilinkarrow-up11.36Karrow-down132
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageA new trolley eralemmy.worldmondoman712@lemmy.ml to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square156fedilink
minus-squareNo_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down22·2 months agoCan always tell a hexbear crackhead from the comment alone. On the mark again.
minus-squareNuclearDolphin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·2 months agostoopid tankie, getting high on sources
minus-squareAeroLemming@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 months agoI don’t even like tankies, but this one didn’t say anything wrong.
minus-squareNo_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoThe idea that a lack of proof refutes the idea is an argument in ignorance. Literally tankie ragebait.
minus-squareSeducingCamel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoSo we should just believe any hearsay about China bad because China bad?
minus-squareNo_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·2 months agoFact that you’re calling it hearsay says plenty lmao. Go back to your Uyghur camp
Can always tell a hexbear crackhead from the comment alone. On the mark again.
stoopid tankie, getting high on sources
I don’t even like tankies, but this one didn’t say anything wrong.
The idea that a lack of proof refutes the idea is an argument in ignorance. Literally tankie ragebait.
So we should just believe any hearsay about China bad because China bad?
Fact that you’re calling it hearsay says plenty lmao. Go back to your Uyghur camp