Disclaimer: I know thereās a lot of questions and posts like this but generally theyāre aimed at noobs. I consider myself an intermediate user, and I know generally distros donāt matter much and you can have anything another distro has on any distro but Iām looking for something a little āspecificā that better suits my need from the get-go, I guess we could say that yeah. Plus hey some discussion wonāt hurt Lemmy.
I come here to seek your advice oh Great Council of Linux. Please hear my cause:
The problem
Right now I use NixOS and Iām mostly happy with it, I like having everything declared on a config file I can audit to remove stuff I donāt use anymore, I like the stability it provides and the rollback feature (I only sued it once but glad to have it), automatic updates that apply when I shut down my PC (I do that often) and wonāt bork everything, and I like that it generally has very up to date software even on its stable branch. I also like the possibility of using nix-shell to test a program and remove it immediately afterwards even if it leads to a messy .config folder sometimes.
However, there are some pain points especially when it comes to customization. Now, the system itself is very usable and have little complains there, itās very rare that a package I want isnāt in the repo, and when everything works itās great, but when it doesnāt work itās very frustrating (mainly due to the lack of documentation and troubleshooting via the unofficial discord can be a pain). Namely on my laptop I have issues with the cursor sometime going from the catppuccin theme (on plasma 5, laptop is 23.11) to default on some context menus on X11 or only shows the theme in windows if using wayland (tho I can wait to see if itās fixed on 24.05). I never had this on my desktop gaming PC (which used 23.11 but now switched it to unstable to have plasma 6) but I have other problems there, for example the catppuccin SDDM corners theme doesnāt apply anymore for some reason. Now Iām someone who likes to customize the looks of my desktop and I want to have consistency in my theming as much as possible so these issues are very annoying to me. On top of that to resolve the latter the official git repo of the package says to use flakes, now I know many fans of NixOS will swear flakes are cool and all but I absolutely hate them: I find them confusing, I donāt like having to deal with more stuff than just my config file and home-manager and I want to have nothing to do with them I just want to use the official packages.
Now Iām sure most of these issues arenāt exactly NixOSās fault and maybe in 24.05 theyāll all be fixed but Iām getting very annoyed both by these problems and I found it hard to solve other problems in the past as well, and I hate that searching stuff up on ecosia, the wiki, etc doesnāt work most of the time due to how different NixOS is and while the (unoffical) discord is generally useful sometimes it cannot provide the help I need, plus most of the stuff I learn troubleshooting NixOS is specific to NixOS and doesnāt translate to other linux distros. So thatās why on one side Iām considering that maybe itās not worth waiting till the end of the month to see if 24.05 fixes my issues (I donāt plan on staying on unstable after the release of 24.05 thatās certain) or if I should stick with it instead of wasting a day reconfiguring everything (granted home-manager is cool af but a lot of stuff I use donāt use it so itās a one-time pain).
What I look for
Generally in a distro I look for something minimal, easily customizable and where I can use the terminal a lot for installing software and stuff (I just like the progression bars and seeing all the text go weeee accross the screen itās so cool) tho Iām fine using some GUI stuff like the KDE settings for other stuff where the alternative is a very complex set of config files (I generally prefer keeping wonky GUIs to a minimum though so Iām fine with some config files).
More specifically, I require a distro to have out of the box:
- Plasma 6: I am moving to wayland, I love KDE Plasma for its customization and a lot of the stuff I made myself uses Qt. Maybe one day Iāll try Cosmic but rn I just like plasma 6.
- Easy to theme and configure: particularly with catppuccin
- Proton VPN: the official apps, doesnāt matter if the distro is officially supported or not by Proton
- Steam, discord, gaming stuff & proprietary stuff directly on the repo: or at least easily enabled during the installation, without jumping through hoops
- Rollback feature: be it what NixOS has, snapshots or whatever that btrfs thing is, itās ok if I have to set it up myself if needs be, I need to learn how, but I prefer if itās there out of the box
- Big repo
What Iād like to have but isnāt a must have:
- Minimal amount of pre-installed packages: I want to choose myself what goes on my system and donāt want to uninstall lots of things
- Being able to leave it untouched for months without risking to brick it when I update
- Decent information and help available: if Iām leaving NixOS Iād rather not deal with poor documentation
- Immutability: I generally like the stability this provides, the atomicity of the updates, etc etc just as long as it doesnāt make theming stuff like KDE (with plugins), Grub, SDDM, etc painful.
As for what I donāt like:
- Flatpaks: I prefer using system packages in general, plus I donāt like their terminal commands and I hear theyāre not exactly good at following system themes. I guess I could live with them if I have to with flatseal and maybe a better terminal way to install them though.
- Snaps: I hate snaps and in my experience worked terribly, like steam not being able to detect game libraries on other hard drives etc, graphical bugs, plus their backend is proprietary and handled by canonical, see following point.
- Corporations: I donāt want my OS to be handled by a corporation, I donāt trust them so Iād rather minimize their control over the OS.
- Custom theming: this isnāt too important since Iāll customize the theme myself regardless, I just generally try to stick to a distroās theme if thereās one cause why not. Iām only putting this here to signal I prefer something unthemed (but possibly with a cool logo)
What am I considering?
Right now Iām considering the following options:
- Stay with NixOS: Wait for 24.05 see if that fixes my issues etc
- Bazzite + Aurora: Both are Fedora uBlue spins with KDE. Iām planning on putting Bazzite on my gaming PC since everything is already set up for that and Aurora (KDE spin of Bluefin) on my laptop (I use it for gaming on occasion but itās more for other stuff). They look cool but Iām not too familiar with them, the gripes I have, or think I will have, are flatpaks, some pre-installed stuff like vscode (I use neovim) and also that itās a spin of Fedora, which IMO is a bit too close to Red Hat but I can live with this given these two are different from fedora and further away from RH. Also, can I use ujust to install/uninstall things? What does it do?
- OpenSUSE: I hear good things about Tumbleweed, I also know they have an immutable version but I know very little about it. I tried it in a VM for a few minutes to check out YaST and I was positively impressed but it comes with a lot of pre-installed stuff like a graphical package manager (yes I know thereās zypper and that itās slow, I donāt mind too much if it works and isnāt too bad) and I heard it has something similar to the AUR which Iāll need to check out as I saw the normal tumbleweed repos missed some packages I like.
- Arch: I used Arch (btw) for a long time and generally liked it, I didnāt have many issues with it and when I did it was usually my fault (tbf thatās often the same on NixOS) and I generally could fix them easily (only once did my system break after the power went out during an update requiring a reinstall), the thing I donāt like is having to update it weekly manually (I donāt trust automatic updates on non-immutable distros much) and this is fine generally but itās a problem for my gaming PC because I have to move away from the house itās in for months on end and telling people to turn it on weekly so I can ssh and update it remotely into it is bothersome. Also, while I like seeing the little pacmans eat the dots, after using NixOS I learned to appreciate updates that donāt require me to rtfm, that I donāt have to care about too much and donāt risk borking something in my system even if itās a small thing. Plus I figured I could try something else knowing that worst case scenario I can always go back to the trusty old Arch. Maybe I could try Arco instead of Vanilla Arch in this case.
Iām open to suggestions for other options though, thereās trillions of distros.
What am I excluding
- Debian & co: nothing against Debian, but I used it once and found it very frustrating to use, the packages are fairly outdated (and I donāt see that as more stable than say NixOS with the rollback and everything), I had to manually install every proprietary thing, add repos here and there, etc and overall I didnāt like it. Also I donāt think it has plasma 6 yet. I donāt see much point in using any of its derivatives either.
- Gentoo: I donāt want to compile everything
- Fedora itself: too close to RH, its derivates I can tolerate but Iād prefer to avoid Fedora and RH stuff if possible
That is all that comes to my mind right now. Thanks in advance.
This makes the false assumption that a CEO would make every decision in the company, but Iāll humor this anyway. If this were to happen, Fedora would lose Red Hatās sponsorship. There have been a number of community discussions detailing the friction that contributors have already had with Red Hat, some even left after they privatized the RHEL source code. Some are looking for any reason to stop because they dislike Red Hat. This simply would not fly, and youād see contributors leaving en masse. Similar discussions have been echoed by contributors before, and I donāt expect volunteers to stay around and work for a project that they couldnāt trust to uphold the interest of the community anymore. Both Fedora and Red Hat would be immensely damaged, and Red Hat would have to spend far beyond the amount that they spend sponsoring Fedora to hire new contributors so that RHEL can be maintained, as Red Hat does not have the resources to maintain RHEL without the Fedora community. This would be career suicide for the CEO, and given how much Red Hat relies on Fedora, the threat would be empty in any case. It does not benefit Red Hat to destroy the project fueling their enterprise distro. RHEL already modifies Fedora substantially, as it does not share the same design principles, and Fedora does not actually reflect the direction of RHEL. Even if this were to happen, the answer to all of the ābut what if?ā questions is the same: you can switch distros. Things like this make waves in this community; it wouldnāt go unnoticed, especially given how popular Fedora is. Itās the same situation with any distro. āBut what if they run out of money and development suddenly slows to an unreasonable pace?ā Switch distros. Speculating about situations like this is not constructive. You can speculate unlikely situations for any distro you choose, and be caught in an endless loop of irrational ābut what if?ā questions. The answer, as with all things Linux, is the same: fork it, or find an alternative. Money isnāt going to appear out of nowhere, so the reality is that the Fedora Project (or the fork of it following this) would have to rely solely on community donations, or perhaps try to secure a sponsorship from another company (like Amazon, which uses Fedora as a base for their distro iirc). Worst case scenario: Fedora dies and you install a different distro. I donāt really see the point in asking these kinds of questions.
Thanks for your explanation, that makes sense. Was just curious what your take on this is, since a lot of CEOs made some very irrational decisions in the past like the recent Unity debacle or Reddit killing the community. Sometimes asking āwhat ifā can help understand the situation. Of course with Linux we have all the options in case something bad happens