• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There were a lot of Pro-Palestinian protests last November in my city. One of them blocked a small bridge, and this was a conversation I had 3 times that day:

    Some Chud: “This is really dangerous! What if an ambulance needs to get by!”

    Me: “They’re letting emergency vehicles pass, and police are on the scene to make sure nothing unsafe happens.”

    S.C.: “Well, they’re certainly not winning anyone over with tactics like this!”

    Me: “They’re not trying to win you over, their stated goal is to force [X] politician to respond.”

    S.C.: “Well then they should go protest at [X] politicians house!”

    Me: “They protested at [X]'s office last week, but it wasn’t very disruptive, so you didn’t hear about it.”

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s been non-stop protests in politician homes in Texas. You don’t hear about them because they’re peaceful.

      So maybe blocking roads is the way.

  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Never gets old, seeing idiots admit that hundreds or thousands of years can pass but the only way they can get what they want done is violence.

    We live in a world where even war isn’t profitable anymore, where you can overthrow leaders with a social media post, but you morons still choose dumb ape brain impulse.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Uhhhhhh what? The difference between us and those in power is the fact that those in power are willing to do violence to get what they want. The problem is you have a very limited definition of what violence is. When a train CEO cuts safety SOPs that results in a train derailing and poisoning a whole town, that’s a form of passive violence against working people. When politicians pass laws restricting the rights of a specific demographic, that’s a form of passive political violence. But the moment working people take the path only available to them, they are called apes and uncivilized? Nah fam, before every popular revolution, the people warned those in charge that equity and inclusion is needed to keep society going, leaders rebuff those plees. So no, stop blaming those with little to nothing for becoming fed up.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh really? So the protests of smashing in other people’s businesses was necessary for changing the power structure? Did it work? Why not? How many protests have happened at actual seats of power? None? So this is all just bullshit posturing by dipshits that changes nothing except to keep working class people like those protesting on their knees?

        I don’t give a fuck if you’re fed up, learn how your actions influence the world around you or stay inside and pout about it. Your violent revolution being focused into creating nothing but civil unrest and vandalism is short-sighted, hypocritical, and is completely absent of the virtues you claim to have. You are not an enlightened rebel, you’re an overactive Karen trying to solve their problems with a tantrum instead of any direct plan. You get mad and break shit. That’s your protest. How is that unlike an overgrown toddler?

        I work retail, I have the most to gain from an actual shift in power structure but watching morons throw rocks into local businesses to protest a CEO getting a pay raise is the most retarded shit I can imagine besides you defending it.

        • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Tucker Carlson is that you?! Lol you didn’t address any of my points and just spouted out GOP talking points that are within the ballpark.

          Just because their are some people that take advantage of protests as an opportunity to loot and vandalize doesn’t devalue the protests. Since you have all the answers on how people should live their lives, how exactly should people influence society? I’m willing to bet you’ve just been ignoring those movements because you just don’t agree with equity and inclusion.

          One last question, when a corporation or political group does violence on society, what should the punishment be? (shouldn’t it be the same punishment as if a individual does it?)

          • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lol make a point and I’ll respond to it. What’s crazy is the retards calling every point that doesn’t agree with theirs “GOP”. When everything to the right of your extreme bullshit is “GOP” you’re going to find yourself real alone real fast.

            Productive violence is not the same as protests. Protests are tantrums for attention that, in this SoCiEtY, is fast fleeting if not capitalized on quickly. What did the BLM riots achieve? Not a God damn thing. If anything it gave the actual GOP great footage of what the left does when they get angwy.

            And no, a group is never a single entity, even corporations or political groups. Holding every member responsible for a murder that one person did isn’t justice unless every single person knew and planned that act. Their participation and knowledge would be key factors in determining punishment and each member would be weighed differently irrespective of their group status.

            • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I made several points. You just don’t want to address them because you don’t have a counter. You just don’t want to think critically about protests so you just call them tantrums and riots. Once again their were no BLM riots. Not a thing. There were BLM protests, that were take advantage of by rioters. But BLM as an organization and as a movement never organized nor sanctioned/endorsed any riots. And I’m pretty sure the BLM/George Floyd protests changed policing for the better. Police in America are now all wearing body cameras and many areas set up independent boards who review cases of police misconduct. Just a bandaid to our broken justice system but better than what we had before.

              So you believe corporations should be allowed to kill, injure, and destroy simply because they aren’t individuals? Interesting. Just proves you may not like the label of GOP puppet but that’s what you are. Sorry but you are that and everyone knows it. Don’t worry, people with actual empathy compassion and knowledge of other people different than them are fighting for your emancipation as well. Have a good life. Goodbye forever.

    • cinnamonTea@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I would really love an example for a war that didn’t happen because it wasn’t profitable, or a relevant leader toppled by social media. We live in a world where there aren’t any politicians we can vote for to actually lead to any change, and wars are closer to many of us than they have been in a long time, both physically and through the visibility of social media and globalisation. If there’s a peaceful way to stop this that you’re aware of, please do enlighten us

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I would really love an example for a war that didn’t happen because it wasn’t profitable

        Holy shit. You think we made money in Vietnam? Made money in the Korean war? Think there’s enough oil in the Middle East to justify a 20 year occupation? I bet the shoes of the Jewish people really gave us kickbacks in World War II.

        War is almost never profitable and the only people who think it is are trying to drum up any excuse as to be violent little rebels. Can war lead to change? Absolutely. The dickless protests of ruining local shops are nothing more than annoying to the people who aren’t affected by it and devastating to the people who are. Stop trying to be fucking virtuous rebels and stand with groups and organizations that are pushing for change without a fucking brick in their hand. Unreal I have to even explain this.

        We live in a world where there aren’t any politicians we can vote for to actually lead to any change

        What a double dose of retardation that is. I’ve heard nothing but “Trump is going to destroy democracy if he gets elected!” but now I have you saying “Nah they’re bullshitting, it doesn’t matter, never will.” None of the politicians running are running on issues you want them to, that’s your problem. Maybe instead of dressing in all black and vandalizing property you get with that same group and push someone into office. Imagine how effective that could be on jumpstarting a progressive candidate.

        The only violence I’m okay with is the kind that makes less billionaires. Go Johnny Silverhand Trump Tower then get back to me.

        • cinnamonTea@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s exactly what I mean, though. All these wars happen even though they aren’t profitable, so I don’t see how that’s relevant.

          Not saying politics can’t change for the worse, just that I haven’t seen voting, etc. change it for the better in a long time. It used to and I think peaceful protests and activism could help, just saying it’s not very visible as helpful right now.

          I don’t even see how you ended up getting into a tirade about vandalising from this post, especially if you agree that attacking billionaires directly has a chance of helping - isn’t that exactly what the cartoon shows?

          I agree with you that riots and vandalising aren’t currently helping - but I also don’t see them as a prevailing problem. Where is this currently going on? Most of what I see are peaceful protests with limited coverage and even more limited consequences