• Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    214
    ·
    1 year ago

    …the company dies.

    Oh for fucks sakes we have an edgel0rd over here. You can just stop watching the channel if you don’t like them.

    • ShunkW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      160
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s nothing wrong with hoping an unethical company goes under.

      • joel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think they’re beyond redemption. My hope is that Linus can take a step back and let the CEO work on improving the workplace culture. No idea if he’s up to the challenge but time will tell

        • FMT99@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Beyond redemption, no, but refusing to acknowledge any wrongdoing doesn’t paint a pretty picture for the future. In the days since I’ve heard “we couldn’t have done any better”, “yes we messed up but it wouldn’t have made any difference if the numbers were right”, “no one could expect us to spend 500 dollars to redo a messed up review”

          Not once did I hear a mea culpa or we’ll try harder to do better in the future. Not a good look.

          • snor10@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Linus:

            That didn’t happen.

            And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.

            And if it was, that’s not a big deal.

            And if it is, that’s not my fault.

            And if it was, I didn’t mean it.

            And if I did, you deserved it.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          After digging into this whole fiasco and it’s various aspects, I’m coming to think that this is a leadership problem, pure and simple, and that the leader that allowed these pretty egregious situations to exist and metastasize is Linus. So sure, good for him for basically bootstrapping a company up to a ~$100M valuation… but that is absolutely not an excuse for, and in no way justifies the internal and external ethical lapses.

          The best case here is if the new LMG CEO forces a sharp, top-down culture shift that enables more sustainable working practices, better employee treatment and culture, increased rigor in the data they present, and an explicit public acknowledgement that their previous high-handed interactions with some creators and brands - and ethical conflicts of interest with others - did, in fact, occur, and will be seriously investigated in the interest of not repeating those failures in the future. But given Linus’s continued “woe is me”/borderline gaslighting, I’ll believe change is coming when I actually see it. For now, I’ve unsubscribed.

      • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        51
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe, but spare a thought for the ordinary people who would lose their jobs as a result.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My thoughts go to the dependency on jobs for survival but that leads into a conversation about AI, the end of enough jobs for humans and the need for universal basic income. Job loss doesn’t much affect my choice to interact with a corporation or wish for it to change (which may affect jobs).

      • trachemys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        77
        ·
        1 year ago

        They seem to have an excess of testosterone and are too sloppy, but unethical and worthy of cancellation is typical internet outrage over reaction.

        • ShunkW@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Being invested in a company and giving glowing reviews to their products and only offering critiques of their competitors is pretty fucking unethical

    • dtc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can’t hear what you’re saying with linus’ stringy cock in your mouth, mate.

    • rizoid@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      An unethical company that allows it’s employees to be assaulted doesn’t need to exist.