According to Billet themselves, they heard nothing about compensation or payback until about 3 hours after the original GN video went live… Which Billet hadnt even replied to before Linus made his post saying they’ve already made the deal on compensation.

  • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The quality was already going down, but now I’m unsubbed and I’ll never click on a LTT video again. Sorry, but this behavior is just unacceptable.

    “We didn’t sell it, we auctioned it”, Jesus H. fucking Christ.

    • Ryumast3r@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      GN also literally said “auction” not “sold” in his first video, so Linus’s response was doubly stupid.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t even matter. An auction is selling too, same thing. If I put my stuff on eBay and someone buys it I don’t say I “auctioned it off”, I say “I sold it to some guy on eBay”. It’s just fixed price vs a bidding, in the end a price gets reached and a transaction occurs.

        Linus can’t seem to take the L and just digs the grave deeper. Unfortunately at this point LTT is too big to fail, but I hope it puts a dent in their numbers and makes them eat some humble pie. Maybe they can fix their internal issues then.

        • Ryumast3r@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean I completely agree with you in that the semantic bullshit is bullshit, my point was that Linus wasn’t even correct in his attempt at BS because GN didn’t use the word “sold”. GN used the same word that Linus is attempting to say is totally different.

          • SugaredScoundrel@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Linus used the semantics that it sold for “charity” ie. “We didn’t sell it for money for us! We sold it for someone else’s benefit!”

        • Nefyedardu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Linus’s brain simply cannot accept he did something wrong, so the cognitive dissonance forces him to make these great leaps of logic. He could have ended everything with a simple “I’m sorry, we’ll correct this” but his ego would never allow it.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        He admits he doesn’t watch videos but instead reads the comments. Commenters often oversimplify things like this.

      • Clav64@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m going to borrow things “to try” from my friends house, say they sucked, and then sell them on eBay.

        I’ll just say I auctioned them.

        GOT EM.