Shuttering of New York facility raises awkward climate crisis questions as gas – not renewables – fills gap in power generation

When New York’s deteriorating and unloved Indian Point nuclear plant finally shuttered in 2021, its demise was met with delight from environmentalists who had long demanded it be scrapped.

But there has been a sting in the tail – since the closure, New York’s greenhouse gas emissions have gone up.

Castigated for its impact upon the surrounding environment and feared for its potential to unleash disaster close to the heart of New York City, Indian Point nevertheless supplied a large chunk of the state’s carbon-free electricity.

Since the plant’s closure, it has been gas, rather then clean energy such as solar and wind, that has filled the void, leaving New York City in the embarrassing situation of seeing its planet-heating emissions jump in recent years to the point its power grid is now dirtier than Texas’s, as well as the US average.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Building new nuclear plants isn’t particularly easy when there are environmentalists clamoring to shut them all down and a general public that’s scared of atoms.

    Also, don’t accuse articles of being “propaganda” and then call 68 years “nearing a century” to fearmonger for your own view instead.

              • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                It weakens your claim that it’s not hyperbole, since the meaning of words like that are consensus-based.

                Do you seriously think it would make sense for a 68-year-old man to claim that he’s “nearly a century old”? That wouldn’t be misleading?

                • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Good grief. If your little sample size of two people, you included, is enough for you to feed your confirmation bias then go right ahead, but I’m gonna cut this nonsense short as I have really better things to do than holding pointless internet arguments with simpletons who also compare nuclear power plants with humans.