• billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    So this is great except for the cheating thing. Why am I being punished as the games owner because someone else in my family was banned for cheating? Ban the cheater not the owner.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do it on a 3 strikes basis. They don’t ban an account in a single offense. And therefore shouldn’t do that to account groups either. It’s not perfect. But it’s much more forgiving and fair.

        • example@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          you’re not getting banned from steam, you’re generally getting banned from participating in anti cheat secured lobbies of a single game or a group of games.

          single player experience is generally not affected.

          having a 3 strike system before getting banned from multiplayer just means it’s 66% cheaper for a cheater to get a new copy of the game.

          this is also not new and has been the case for the current family sharing system as well.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly I think it’s a good thing. It strongly decentivizes cheating by there being a possibility of real-world consequences for cheating.