Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoDVD-like optical disc could store 1.6 petabits (or 200 terabytes) on 100 layerswww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1397arrow-down113
arrow-up1384arrow-down1external-linkDVD-like optical disc could store 1.6 petabits (or 200 terabytes) on 100 layerswww.techspot.comWilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareMisterD@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoIt’s the number of times faster it can read or burn compared to the original speed of reading and burning
minus-squarecholesterol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoDoes the ‘original speed’ mean what the natural playback would have been? So 60 minutes of audio burned by a x60 drive would take one minute?
minus-squareMNByChoice@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoYes, but I think there was some overhead in the process that was slower.
minus-squareunphazed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoMemory limitations. Back then RAM was like 512 max
minus-squareMNByChoice@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoYou are correct. However, I mean initialization and finalizing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R Looks like a 52x wrote at 7.8 MB/s. Things have changed.
It’s the number of times faster it can read or burn compared to the original speed of reading and burning
Does the ‘original speed’ mean what the natural playback would have been? So 60 minutes of audio burned by a x60 drive would take one minute?
Yes, but I think there was some overhead in the process that was slower.
Memory limitations. Back then RAM was like 512 max
You are correct. However, I mean initialization and finalizing.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R Looks like a 52x wrote at 7.8 MB/s. Things have changed.