What I said is: you can be wrong with an allegation in the past, but it does not mean that you’ll be wrong with another allegation with no related subject in the future.
He may be wrong about Ukraine/Russia, but this subject is different from Gaza/Israel, which he is right and we have many evidences of the last one.
And so this makes it ok to “both sides” the war in Ukraine? This makes zero sense
I did not say that.
What I said is: you can be wrong with an allegation in the past, but it does not mean that you’ll be wrong with another allegation with no related subject in the future.
He may be wrong about Ukraine/Russia, but this subject is different from Gaza/Israel, which he is right and we have many evidences of the last one.
You’re trying to steamroll the user’s valid point which is that this person is a shitty source of info.
What? Are you on drugs?
it’s not a valid point. it’s the very definition of poisoning the well.