• JBloodthorn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The logic is that they don’t count ignition costs because they only have to be paid once. So it’s producing more than it consumes, and would eventually start netting a surplus.

    • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except it’s not and it won’t. It’s just a fraction of a second pop and done. There’s no sustained reaction because inertial confinement by it’s nature is extremely temporary, and there’s no way to introduce new fuel. If they do some monster fuel pellet that outshines the laser then sure - they can claim a net surplus. If they find some contrivance to keep a reaction going after it’s started then fantastic, well done, the day is saved. But they’re not likely to do that at the NIF because, shhh! NIF is not really about generating energy.