• Kraivo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m from muslim family but atheist and have nothing against it. Like, it is just operation that become too popular at some point. Or was forced on people to prevent an epidemy of some sort. It is still recommended across many surgeons at least as far as i know. It is just easier to recover from when you are younger. Similar to recovering from smallpox.

      • Kraivo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am surprised by amount of negativity on this sub. Like it is almost impossible to have a decent conversation. People just go nuts about operation which is about hygiene. Good luck, guys. I just don’t see myself here

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, why would so many people have negative views on chopping off part of a baby’s body?

          Weird.

        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m cut, and like it that way. But your position is flawed.

          If you believe in evolution then you can agree that foreskin exists for a biological function, right? It’s not about hygiene, that’s dogma. It’s wild that it’s based in religion originally because if ‘god’ made you in his image it’s pretty fucked up to immediately alter a baby to be different.

          It’s funny when people assign the term ‘negative’ to anything they don’t want to hear about.
          You don’t have to read anything you don’t want to. Move on if you don’t have anything to contribute

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            So I actually have no dog in this fight but I read this

            If you believe in evolution then you can agree that foreskin exists for a biological function, right?

            Counterpoint: that was before “pants.”

            Good question though, most of the animal world has retractable peni, why’d we lose that ability? Now I’m curious.

            Also, shouldn’t the religious oppose it because it is fucking with “God’s creation?” Frankly them supporting it seems like flawed logic to me.

            • jerry@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, mutations are mutations, they have no purpose, some are beneficial and are prioritized by evolution.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                So you’re saying we lost retractable penises “just because?”

                Cause I looked into it, and it seems that since we walk upright there’s less of a chance at scraping it on the ground, so we can trade dicksheaths for extra room in our hips which would likely help moving around on two legs, which makes sense.

            • SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Let’s note here that evolution doesn’t care for “functions” or “utility” as much as it cares for “reasons”. We won’t be the first nor the last animal to get screwed in a shitty trade-off that natural selection deemed necessary. Humans are notorious for being born far more defenseless than most other mammals - evolution forced it upon us because otherwise our larger heads would kill far too many mothers.

            • legion02@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I hadn’t even thought about pants as being a compounding factor. It seems unlikely that cavemen had better cleanliness education than we do but smegma build up would be a problem even for them… Unless underwear/pants are what cause it to build up.

          • jerry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was originally the Jewish convent with God. Idk why I was sliced, but it became common in the U.S.

            • 4lan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s an oddly barbaric tradition to keep around for so long without a religious rationalization. Most circumcised Americans are not Jewish

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re an absolute pig that doesn’t wash his penis, yeah it’s better for hygiene. I have a better solution than chopping of your peepee, though: how about you fucking wash it?

        • dtc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You aren’t required to comment, but thanks for letting us know how unhappy you are here.

          Guys, its working

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The smallpox analogy is false. It is a simple procedure as an adult. There is no reason to force it on people who can’t consent.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait can we say retard again? I thought that was one of the no-no words adults have been forbidden to say by other adults.