• Fishroot [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Is it the same “taiwan has mountains in the middle of the island making the invasion hard” and “we can always nuke the three gorges dam and collapse the ccp” rhetoric strategies?

    That shit has been Taiwan tabloid tv level geopolitical strategy.

    • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s like the Asian version of British chuds harping on about the all-powerful Royal Navy when they don’t even know how to steer a ship

        • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 months ago

          They heard the Chinese slaves cleaners were being replaced by a not-as-delectable underclass, so they decided why even bother

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sending their most modern destroyer to bomb Yemen and then admitting it can’t bomb Yemen because it does not have surface-surface missiles (neither does 90% of RN) was also top level lulz.

        • GinAndJuche@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Part of me has to wonder: what are the impacts on national self-identity of being utterly reliant on a third-party for defense against the historical opposing nation? It has to be one of those things nationalists shove under the rug, right?

          Like how Texans ignore they lost the war with Mexico so hard they’d be part of Mexico again/still if they didn’t beg to become a state.

          Or how Americans pretend the French didn’t win the bourgeois revolution for us.

          • ProfessorAdonisCnut [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            10 months ago

            Like how Texans ignore they lost the war with Mexico so hard they’d be part of Mexico again/still if they didn’t beg to become a state.

            Remember the Alamo, just not its context

          • Fishroot [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            tbh, any national right wing capitalist states from the modern era are mostly propped up by imperial powers. The nationalistic narratives is mostly for local consumption and a way to discipline the population.

            Any actual nationalistic aspiration is viable if it is Left wing and anti-capitalist because its main goal is to break away from the imperial system.

          • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Texans ignore they lost the war with Mexico so hard they’d be part of Mexico again/still if they didn’t beg to become a state

            what are you talking about, they won the war & were independent the better part of a decade before joining the US. it was a lucky break that they captured Santa Anna and they probably would have lost without that, but they did.

            • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yeah I am really confused by this. Part of the fucked up nature of the Mexican-American war was that the US had agreed NOT to annex Texas. Direct fighting had ended but the Republic of Texas has to remain out of US hands.