It’s all about the money supply. The devalued our money so workers think they were making more to avoid a communist revolution.

  • CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, this is like saying “$10,000,000 would buy you a house in 1910, and $10,000,000 would buy you a house in 2023”

    It would take a lot more gold to buy you a house in 2023 than it would have in 1923

      • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yet house prices have not. The price of housing, let alone homes, has outpaced inflation and wages not too gradually for half a century now.

    • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you look below, the comments did the math; Same amount of gold.

      The main issue is that gold isn’t directly used as currency, so this post is really saying “if you bought something worth a house, it is worth a house. Isn’t that weird?”

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Gold used to be directly tied to our currency, but you can’t just print more money when it’s based off a gold standard, and the government didn’t like that, so they changed the standard.