• jorge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The US FCC defines ionizing radiation as wavelengths smaller than 124 nm (which corresponds more or less to the ionization energy of both oxygen and hydrogen, so it is a sensible definition).

    The “most starlight” part is a bit trickier. Stars emit light in a wide spectrum (approximately black body radiation) depending on their temperature: hotter stars emit bluer light and are more luminous, but very rare, while cooler stars are redder and fainter, and much more common. Yellow stars (spectral type G), like the Sun, emit mostly between 400 nm and 750 nm (visible spectrum), while red stars (spectral type M) mostly emit from 700 nm to 1000 nm,

    So let’s say that you want all the light with wavelengths of 1000 nm or smaller turned into ionizing radiation. That gives us a blue-shift of 1+z = lambda_obs/lambda_em = 124 nm/ 1000 nm = 0.124.

    The relation between speed and blue(/red)-shift is given by the relativistic Doppler effect:

    1+z = sqrt((1+beta)/(1-beta))

    where beta=v/c and c is the speed of light. Solving for beta

    beta = ((1+z)^2 -1)/((1+z)^2 +1)

    And plugging the numbers, you get beta = -0.970, where the minus sign means that you are moving towards the star. At 97% of the speed of light.

    If you only wanted to turn most of the sunlight into ionizing radiation, you would need “just” 94.7% of the speed of light.

    • Troy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is a fantastic answer that clearly spells out the assumptions made and the effects of those assumptions. Well done :)

      The sci fi fan in me now wonders: assuming you get to 0.95c before it becomes truly problematic, what kind of shielding would you need at the front of your probe(/spacecraft/etc.) to prevent the effect from totally destroying the probe. Like you can’t just blast electronics with x-rays and harsher and expect it to run. So there is probably a mass tradeoff here with a big ole block of ablating lead at the front that ablates from radiation spalling?

      There’s probably a cost optimization curve there – mass of shielding, travel time, energy cost to accelerate the probe.

      Furthermore, there would be a pressure exerted by that radiation that should slow the probe down over time, but the rate of slowing will depend on the mass/cross section/etc.

      And of course running into an interstellar proton or such will be somewhat of a high energy event… More shielding, or hypothetical defenses like the bussard ramscoop…