• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This is why:

    1. The FTC needs to do its job and start outlawing all these obscene subscription business models for things that are rightfully products, not services. Where’s my goddamned First Sale Doctrine, FTC?!

    2. Software Engineers working on commercial products need to be professionally licensed, so that proper consequences can be applied for unethical “fail-deadly” designs like this one.

    • Technus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      As a software engineer, the thought of my code being responsible for someone’s safety is fucking terrifying. Thankfully I’m not in that kind of position.

      From experience though, I can tell you that most of the reasons software is shitty is because of middle or upper management, either forcing idiotic business requirements (like a subscription where it doesn’t fucking belong!) or just not allocating time to button things up. I can guarantee that every engineer that worked on that thing hated it and thought it was fucking stupid.

      Licensing would be overkill for most software as it’s not usually life and death. I think in this case since it’s safety equipment it really should have been rejected by NHTSA before it ever hit stores.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is managements fault, not the engineers fault.

      We have to implement the requirements we are given. If we don’t, we get fired and they hire someone else who will do it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        If we don’t, we get fired and they hire someone else who will do it.

        If we were licensed, any replacement would be similarly ethically bound to refuse and that tactic wouldn’t work.