• dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Global Foundries up in Buffalo, New York had the same exact Dutch equipment as them and couldn’t get past 12nm.

    Taiwan / TSMC is hitting 3nm today (a feat that even Intel and Samsung cannot accomplish yet), and is well on its way to 2nm designs.

    They’re fucking wizards who are 5+ years ahead of USA. Thank god they’re allies of us. But they’re severely kicking our ass in terms of yields, production, and even technology, using the same machines to ink smaller-and-smaller transistors to a degree impossible to us in the USA today.

    The problem is by the time we figure out 3nm, TSMC will be at 2nm or better. They just consistently lead and are superior over us for the last 20 years or so.

    • beatle@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      nanometer is a marketing term now and doesn’t reflect actual sizes. Samsung were first with “3nm”.

      America was doing “3nm” in 2018. You don’t seem to have any understanding of this issue.

      From Wikipedia:

      The term “3 nanometer” has no direct relation to any actual physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors. According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by IEEE Standards Association Industry Connection, a 3 nm node is expected to have a contacted gate pitch of 48 nanometers and a tightest metal pitch of 24 nanometers.

      Also from Wikipedia:

      South Korean chipmaker Samsung started shipping its 3 nm gate all around (GAA) process, named 3GAA, in mid-2022. On 29 December 2022, Taiwanese chip manufacturer TSMC announced that volume production using its 3 nm semiconductor node termed N3 is under way with good yields.

      In early 2018, IMEC (Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre) and Cadence stated they had taped out 3 nm test chips, using extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) and 193 nm immersion lithography.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        nanometer is a marketing term now and doesn’t reflect actual sizes. Samsung were first with “3nm”.

        And iPhones chose TSMC’s 3nm, because TSMC is more than just 3nm, but also at a scale and price-point that Apple desires.

        America was doing “3nm” in 2018

        I’m talking about industry and manufacturing. Test labs doing one or two wafers back in 2018 doesn’t matter compared to the millions-of-chips that roll off of Taiwan’s production facilities.

        No one in the USA can mass produce designs like this. Korea / Samsung is 2nd best, but still is slower at mass production than Taiwan.

        • beatle@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Which brings us right back to my point. They aren’t wizards, they are simply benefiting from the enormous government investment into the extremely expensive chip manufacturing industry.

          Their manufacturing efficiency is top tier, their government built facilities are top tier. However they weren’t first, they aren’t the only ones who can produce them and now that the US is interested in chip manufacturing again the new facilities will match TSMC in a few years.