• hughesdikus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    A standard which is a “newer” version of an old standard, when a new objectively better standard already exists to replace it.

    You tell me.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s like standard in computers. It’s not meant to be better, it’s meant to imprison the user with the company tools.

      • hughesdikus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Except a country doesnt need anything like that. What is the US afraid of? That its people will suddenly move to Zimbabwe and be happy?

        If there was a genuine benefit to having different standards than rest of the world, then just like wars, more countries would be having them

        US has had millions, if not billions of dollars of losses due to this madness and has itself tried switching to metric system.

        The fact the imperial system itself is now based on the metric system tells you enough

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well it depends. Open standards are created to hopefully catch on by multiple manufacturers and make the interoperability better to make it easier for both consumers and manufacturers.

        Proprietary standards are just simply to lock you into their ecosystem.