…obviously when I say violent protest I mean viol3nt protest that targets ONLY billionaires and ONLY violent idiots who do the bidding . youre kidding right?
What happened to that man is sad yes but the viol3nce amd anger was directed towards him by stupid protestors who should be directing their anger towards the people actually causing them their pain : greedy billionaires and their bribed politicians. If what happenned to this unfortunate man im that story happened on a daily basis to numerous billionaires and IOF and RSF mercenaries instead everyday numerous times a day… what do you think the world would look lile today?
If you think we would live in the same type of world we live intoday youre GRAVELY mistakened.
THATS why Lenin, Ho Chi Minch, Castro and Mao had to round up so, so many people when they obtained power. Because there are too many humans who are too negative IQ to understand kind words and peace and people setting healthy boundaries … so you have to either re educate t them or deal with them forever. This is the only language that too many people understand sadly. We cannot change this. Humans have always been simultaneously one of the smartest and stupidest species to ever exist so you need to speak to stupid humans in the language they understand… so spea to them in ‘that language’. (Heck, The ONLY reason Salvador Allende and Thomas Sankara couldnt stay in power any longer than they did is because they chose to NOT do this. Are you noticing a trend here?) These are the Red Scare ‘Purges Of Red tErRoR’ you keep on hearing about that happened im China, Cuba, Vietnam, USSR, etc… after the socialists took pwper from the bullshit liberal news sources in western countries. History has shown us for thousands of years that MAAANY people only understand the language of viol3nce…so give them that language they understand. Mao even said ‘democracy comes from the barrell of a gun’ . …Why do you think he said this quote numerous times throughout his life? Do you think he was stupid? …Or maybe do you think he and all the bribed-western and kuomintang fascists that tried to VIOL3NTLY kick him and his people out of power understood a fundamental truth about humans?
In a way you seem to understand what I put across. But really the critical hit is to do nothing. And I mean nothing for a day a week etc. In the US there are “essential” workers. Take the railway protest that resulted in a presidential executive order to force them back to work because 1.8B money was lost. The only way these groups understand is when people don’t show up for work.
ALL forms of protest are performed simultaneously to bring about change. You cant choose only one form and then just only do that, humans are complex. It is expected that if most workers dont show up for work that they are during those expected working hours hunting down billionaires amd their bribed mercenary pigs. Meanwhile other workers who are too old, too young, too weak, or too ill to violently protest dont do anything except help their communities where they can, and ONLY their communities.
If everyome chose to do a sit-in protest then barely anything would change cause without essential workers like farmers, electricians, infrastructure maintenance , and warer treatment scientists , etc numerous peoole would starve or thirst to death ( well until the average person decides to be farmers, electricians, infrastructure maintenance, and water treatment specialists themselves) and the bourgeoisie are perefectly Ok with billions of people starving to death if it means they arent violently resisted and get to keep most of the amenities that they have stolen from their workers and they use to make them happy. Only using sit-ins will lead to inertia , NOTHING will get better or worse and youre underestimating the resilience of the bourgeoisie if you tjink they are not OK with this setup. As lomg as they get to stay in power and keep their bribed piggies, their amenities, their toys, their slaves, and their properties why would they care if billions of people starve to death? They dont give a fuck about that any of us so obviously they would care very little if there were significantly less of us. They would put on some 24/7 news stories about ‘inevitable population collapse cause people dont want to work for us anymore . Wont you think of the poor poor widdle billionaire slave mastahs! 🥺’ …but… thats all that theyll do…
Do you see substantial permanent chamges coming in a scenario like this ? The only time this scenario leads to substantial change is when the bribed piggies are the ones doing the sit-ins . I cant eben think of a single scenario where ALL the bodyguard piggies of a rich fuck decided to not defend them even during a national protest . These bodyguards are mostly there for a paycheque , if these bodyguard piggies are paid enough of a salary they will kill their entire family rather than join in a sit-in that will help them too… So its not happening.
Violent resistance is just one of the tools in the kit but it is a mandatory tool ij the kit because it accelerates the need for a mandatory response from the bourgeoisie to the demands of the workers and honeslty its the only thing Ive ever seen that has ever been shown to accelerate the imprisonment and liquidation of the bourgeoisie. Sit-ins are yet another one of the tools in the kit for people who cant violently resist for one reason or another.
…obviously when I say violent protest I mean viol3nt protest that targets ONLY billionaires and ONLY violent idiots who do the bidding . youre kidding right?
What happened to that man is sad yes but the viol3nce amd anger was directed towards him by stupid protestors who should be directing their anger towards the people actually causing them their pain : greedy billionaires and their bribed politicians. If what happenned to this unfortunate man im that story happened on a daily basis to numerous billionaires and IOF and RSF mercenaries instead everyday numerous times a day… what do you think the world would look lile today?
If you think we would live in the same type of world we live intoday youre GRAVELY mistakened.
THATS why Lenin, Ho Chi Minch, Castro and Mao had to round up so, so many people when they obtained power. Because there are too many humans who are too negative IQ to understand kind words and peace and people setting healthy boundaries … so you have to either re educate t them or deal with them forever. This is the only language that too many people understand sadly. We cannot change this. Humans have always been simultaneously one of the smartest and stupidest species to ever exist so you need to speak to stupid humans in the language they understand… so spea to them in ‘that language’. (Heck, The ONLY reason Salvador Allende and Thomas Sankara couldnt stay in power any longer than they did is because they chose to NOT do this. Are you noticing a trend here?) These are the Red Scare ‘Purges Of Red tErRoR’ you keep on hearing about that happened im China, Cuba, Vietnam, USSR, etc… after the socialists took pwper from the bullshit liberal news sources in western countries. History has shown us for thousands of years that MAAANY people only understand the language of viol3nce…so give them that language they understand. Mao even said ‘democracy comes from the barrell of a gun’ . …Why do you think he said this quote numerous times throughout his life? Do you think he was stupid? …Or maybe do you think he and all the bribed-western and kuomintang fascists that tried to VIOL3NTLY kick him and his people out of power understood a fundamental truth about humans?
In a way you seem to understand what I put across. But really the critical hit is to do nothing. And I mean nothing for a day a week etc. In the US there are “essential” workers. Take the railway protest that resulted in a presidential executive order to force them back to work because 1.8B money was lost. The only way these groups understand is when people don’t show up for work.
…What are you talking about?
ALL forms of protest are performed simultaneously to bring about change. You cant choose only one form and then just only do that, humans are complex. It is expected that if most workers dont show up for work that they are during those expected working hours hunting down billionaires amd their bribed mercenary pigs. Meanwhile other workers who are too old, too young, too weak, or too ill to violently protest dont do anything except help their communities where they can, and ONLY their communities.
If everyome chose to do a sit-in protest then barely anything would change cause without essential workers like farmers, electricians, infrastructure maintenance , and warer treatment scientists , etc numerous peoole would starve or thirst to death ( well until the average person decides to be farmers, electricians, infrastructure maintenance, and water treatment specialists themselves) and the bourgeoisie are perefectly Ok with billions of people starving to death if it means they arent violently resisted and get to keep most of the amenities that they have stolen from their workers and they use to make them happy. Only using sit-ins will lead to inertia , NOTHING will get better or worse and youre underestimating the resilience of the bourgeoisie if you tjink they are not OK with this setup. As lomg as they get to stay in power and keep their bribed piggies, their amenities, their toys, their slaves, and their properties why would they care if billions of people starve to death? They dont give a fuck about that any of us so obviously they would care very little if there were significantly less of us. They would put on some 24/7 news stories about ‘inevitable population collapse cause people dont want to work for us anymore . Wont you think of the poor poor widdle billionaire slave mastahs! 🥺’ …but… thats all that theyll do…
Do you see substantial permanent chamges coming in a scenario like this ? The only time this scenario leads to substantial change is when the bribed piggies are the ones doing the sit-ins . I cant eben think of a single scenario where ALL the bodyguard piggies of a rich fuck decided to not defend them even during a national protest . These bodyguards are mostly there for a paycheque , if these bodyguard piggies are paid enough of a salary they will kill their entire family rather than join in a sit-in that will help them too… So its not happening.
Violent resistance is just one of the tools in the kit but it is a mandatory tool ij the kit because it accelerates the need for a mandatory response from the bourgeoisie to the demands of the workers and honeslty its the only thing Ive ever seen that has ever been shown to accelerate the imprisonment and liquidation of the bourgeoisie. Sit-ins are yet another one of the tools in the kit for people who cant violently resist for one reason or another.