• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    How do you know if it’s open source? Well if it’s called something like “huggingface” or “redpajama” there’s a very good chance it’s made by people who have no marketing department. So good odds it’s free.

  • GrappleHat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sure, it is not perfect. But, sometimes it is incredibly helpful. No matter what you do with it, unfortunately, it is not an open-source solution.

    This article needed a better ai to write it .

  • sag@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I can tell its have huggingChat in list without even clicking the article.

  • PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not mentioned in the list, but a project worth keeping an eye on:

    “llamafile: bringing LLMs to the people, and to your own computer - Introducing the latest Mozilla Innovation Project llamafile, an open source initiative that collapses all the complexity of a full-stack LLM chatbot down to a single file that runs on six operating systems.”

    https://future.mozilla.org/blog/introducing-llamafile/

      • PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Here’s the answer, but I have absolutely no idea what it means…

        https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan

        Cosmopolitan Libc makes C a build-once run-anywhere language, like Java, except it doesn’t need an interpreter or virtual machine. Instead, it reconfigures stock GCC and Clang to output a POSIX-approved polyglot format that runs natively on Linux + Mac + Windows + FreeBSD + OpenBSD + NetBSD + BIOS with the best possible performance and the tiniest footprint imaginable.

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good! I’m looking to ditch most search engines (with the possible exception of Searx) since they have become so inundated with so much junk links. Louis Rossmann mentioned in one of his videos that he pays $20/month for GPT-4 since it fetches better results. But I’ll look into this before I do so. Thanks for sharing this.

      • lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Love the sentiment, and I agree, but anti consumer surveillance tech is here to stay, sadly. Can’t tell you how many people in my life have Alexa, FireTV and random shit like that.

    • Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Kagi is the only search engine I use which has really good results and no junk links. …and you have to pay for it, of course. It’s a meta search engine but they use their own indexes for news results and Teclis, which indexes small commercial sites with fewer than 5 trackers. One of the cool features it added recently was an icon for identifying paywalled articles.

      I’d like to recommend Mojeek, my default search engine, but it still has a way to go. If you’re just looking for an “answer engine” rather than a general search engine…I guess an LLM probably isn’t a bad place to start?

      • Mojeek Search Engine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thanks for mentioning us nonetheless! You can help out with that journey, if you want, by chucking some searches (either new ones or old ones you remember being not so great) into the Evaluation Page and voting.

        • Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s good to see you guys on Lemmy :)

          I tested it a bit a few days ago, but I’ll see if I can give it a more rigorous go today. The ones I’ve found Mojeek to be weak in are bug strings that programs I’m working with spit out. Although I think I’ve had more luck in the past few months.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve used GPT4All, and it’s one of the easier ones to get up and running I found. Everything just works out of the box.